Page 1,481«..1020..1,4801,4811,4821,483..1,4901,500..»

Bell County Diabetes Coalition working on plan – Temple Daily Telegram

Posted: June 9, 2017 at 9:45 am

One in three adults has pre-diabetes, and one in 10 of those adults dont know they are at risk.

It makes sense that health care providers and their patients with pre-diabetes and diabetes are continuously looking for further education instruction.

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

If you have previously registered on tdtnews.com, and have a current online subscription you may login with your email and password. Online subscribers get access to all of the Temple Daily Telegram's online content, plus a digital replica of the print edition. Some third party content, including circulars may not be available online.

If you have questions regarding access, please contact circulation at tdtcir@tdtnews.comor 254-778-4444 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Need an account? Create one now.

kAm%96 q6== r@F?EJ s:236E6D r@2=:E:@? 4@?E:?F6D E@ H@C< @? 2 A=2? E@ AC@G:56 5:236E:4D[ E9@D6 H:E9 AC65:236E6D 2?5 E96:C 42C68:G6CD H:E9 :?7@C>2E:@? 2?5 C6D@FC46D 2G2:=23=6 E@ E9@D6 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

kAm#6AC6D6?E2E:G6D 7C@> E96 'p[ q6== r@F?EJ p8C:{:76 tIE6?D:@?[ !C2:C:6 ':6H pU2>Aj| r@@A6C2E:G6 !C@8C2>[ %6>A=6 r@>>F?:EJ r=:?:4[ q2J=@C $4@EE U2>Aj (9:E6 2?5 q6== r@F?EJ x?5:86?E w62=E9 >6E %F6D52J E@ 5:D4FDD E96 36DE H2J E@ 86E :?7@C>2E:@? @FE :?E@ E96 AF3=:4]k^Am

kAm$96CC: (@JE6<[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 %6>A=6 r@>>F?:EJ r=:?:4[ D2:5 E96 4=:?:4 D6CG6D :?5:G:5F2=D E9C@F89@FE q6== r@F?EJ H9@ 2C6 F?:?DFC65 @C F?56C:?DFC65 7C@> 286D `g E@ ed]k^Am

kAm(6 D66 2 E@? @7 49C@?:4 42C6 D:EF2E:@?D[ 2?5 H65 =:<6 E@ @776C >@C6 65F42E:@?[ (@JE6< D2:5]k^Am

kAm%96 4=:?:4 42? AC@G:56 AC:>2CJ 42C6[ 2?5 >2?J E:>6D E96 AC6D4C:AE:@? 2?5 DFAA=:6D[ 2E ?@ 4@DE[ 3FE E96 65F42E:@? 4@>A@?6?E 😀 ?66565 E@ DF446DD7F==J D6CG6 E96D6 :?5:G:5F2=D]k^Am

kAm(@JE6< D2:5 D965 =:<6 E96 4@2=:E:@? 677@CED E@ C2:D6 2H2C6?6DD @7 E96 4=:?:4[ 2?5 E96 D6CG:46D 2?5 DFAA@CE :E @776CD E@ 2 A2CE:4F=2C D68>6?E @7 E96 A@AF=2E:@?]k^Am

kAm(6 86?6C2==J 5@?E EFC? 2?J3@5J 2H2J 3642FD6 H6 2C6 2== D@ 4@??64E65 H6 42? 7:?5 @E96C AC@8C2>D E@ AC@G:56 H92E E96J ?665[ D96 D2:5]k^Am

kAm%96 pC62 p86?4J @? p8:?8 AC@G:56D :ED 4=2DD6D @? s:236E6D $6=7 |2?286>6?E 2?5 r9C@?:4 s:D62D6 4=2DD6D 2E E96 4=:?:4 2?5 E96 A2E:6?ED 2C6 4@>A=:2?E 2D =@?8 2D E96J 2C6 😕 4=2DD[ 3FE 6G6?EF2==J E96J 368:? E@ D=:A[ (@JE6< D2:5[ 2?5 :E >2J 36 D6G6C2= >@?E9D 367@C6 4=2DD6D 2C6 @776C65 282:?]k^Am

kAm%96 'p 42? E2<6 @7 E96 G6E6C2?D[ 3FE >2?J E:>6D E96:C 72>:=:6D ?665 2DD:DE2?46]k^Am

kAm$FD2? qFC497:6=5[ pC62 p86?4J @? p8:?8 4@@C5:?2E@C 7@C 6G:56?46 32D65 AC@8C2>D[ D2:5 E96 286?4J 92D ;FDE 4@>A=6E65 EC2:?:?8 7@C `c 46CE:7:65 4@2496D D@ >@C6 4=2DD6D H:== 36 2G2:=23=6 E9C@F89@FE E96 4@F?EJ 2?5 36J@?5]k^Am

kAmx> C62==J :?E6C6DE65 😕 3C:?8:?8 @FC 4=2DD6D E@ E96 5:776C6?E D:E6D E92E D66 5:236E:4 2?5 AC65:236E:4 A2E:6?ED[ qFC497:6=5 D2:5]k^Am

kAm%2C2 $E277@C5[ 5:C64E@C @7 4@>>F?:EJ 36?67:E 2E q2J=@C $4@EE U2>Aj (9:E6 w62=E9r6?EC2= %6I2D[ 2??@F?465 E96 >65:42= 46?E6C H:== 36 @776C:?8 2 7C66 5:236E6D AC@8C2> 7C@> E96 p>6C:42? s:236E6D pDD@4:2E:@? !@H6C ~G6C s:236E6D] %96 6G6?:?8 4=2DD6D H:== DE2CE yF=J a_ 2?5 36 96=5 2E E96 #2=A9 (:=D@? *@FE9 r=F3 😕 %6>A=6]k^Am

kAmxE 😀 @A6? E@ E96 4@>>F?:EJ[ $E277@C5 D2:5]k^Am

kAm%96C6 2C6 2 ?F>36C @7 5:776C6?E 5:236E6D 65F42E:@? AC@8C2>D 36:?8 @776C65 3J 2 ?F>36C @7 5:776C6?E AC@G:56CD[ 3FE ?@E 6G6CJ@?6 2E:@? 😀 2G2:=23=6[ D2:5 y24<:6 |4{2F89=:?[ p8C:{:76 tIE6?D:@?]k^Am

kAm|4{2F89=:? D2:5 D96 5:5 2 D62C49 7@C 5:236E6D 65F42E:@? @?=:?6 2?5 =@@<65 2E H92E D:E6D D9@H65 FA 2?5 5:776C6?E H63D:E6D 42>6 FA[ :?4=F5:?8 p8C:{:76[ |4{2F89=:? D2:5]k^Am

kAmp 42=6?52C 4@F=5 36 25565 E92E :?4=F56D 4=2DD6D @776C65 3J 5:776C6?E @C82?:K2E:@?D] %96 :DDF6 H@F=5 36 <66A:?8 E96 :?7@C>2E:@? FA52E6]k^Am

kAm!C@G:5:?8 :?7@C>2E:@? 23@FE 5:236E6D 65F42E:@? @776C65 3J E96 5:776C6?E 286?4:6D 2?5 4=:?:4D E@ a`` @A6C2E@CD 4@F=5 36 FD65 E@ D@FC46 E96 4=:6?ED] #6BF:C6>6?ED[ DF49 2D 36:?8 2 46CE2:? 286 2?5 92G:?8 2 46CE2:? :?4@>6[ H@F=5 36 FD65 2D 2 7:=E6C 3J a`` E@ 56E6C>:?6 E96 36DE 7:E 7@C E96 :?5:G:5F2=]k^Am

kAmp 42== E@ E96 AC@G:56C H@F=5 AC@G:56 :?7@C>2E:@? @? 4=2DD6D[ 2?5 E96 65F42E:@? 4@>A@?6?E H@F=5 ?646DD2C:=J 36 E:65 E@ 6=:8:3:=:EJ]k^Am

kAmp A6CD@? H9@ 5@6D?E 7:E E96 4@>>F?:EJ 4=:?:4D C6BF:C6>6?ED H@F=5?E >62? E96J 4@F=5?E 2EE6?5 2 5:236E6D 4=2DD E96C6] %96 p>6C:42? s:236E6D pDD@4:2E:@? 4=2DD6D 36:?8 @776C65 3J q2J=@C $4@EE U2>Aj (9:E6 2C6 @A6? E@ E96 AF3=:4]k^Am

Go here to see the original:
Bell County Diabetes Coalition working on plan - Temple Daily Telegram

Posted in Diabetes | Comments Off on Bell County Diabetes Coalition working on plan – Temple Daily Telegram

Honig family planning diabetes fundraiser – Napa Valley Register

Posted: June 9, 2017 at 9:45 am

This August, Stephanie and Michael Honig of Honig Vineyard and Winery will host a special party on their property in Rutherford to raise money for a nonprofit diabetes organization called Beyond Type 1.

The party at Honig is just one stop on an epic, 10-week adventure for Team Bike Beyond, a cycling team composed of 20 international riders living with Type 1 diabetes. As they pedal their way from New York City to San Francisco, they will spread the word about Type 1 while showing the world what it means to live Beyond Type 1.

The event at Honig Vineyard and Wineryon Aug. 9 at 6 p.m. will raise money and awareness for Type 1 Diabetes.

Musician Nick Jonas, Juliet de Baubigny, Sarah Lucas and Sam Talbot founded Beyond Type 1 in 2015, and 100 percent of every dollar raised directly supports the most promising global efforts and programs working to educate, advocate and cure Type 1 diabetes.

Type 1, which affects more than 420 million people globally, is an autoimmune disease that can happen to anyone, can present at any age, and is not related to diet or lifestyle. The Honigs oldest daughter, Sophia, who recently turned 10, was diagnosed with Type 1 at the age of 5, changing the family dynamic forever.

No parent should ever be told that their child has a life- threatening, incurable disease. We will continue to do everything in our power until a cure is found, said Stephanie Honig.

Rep. Mike Thompson said, The Honigs have been tireless advocates for Sophia and the millions of other children and families living with Type 1 diabetes. Their efforts are more important than ever as federal funding for medical research comes under attack.

On the afternoon of the event, the Napa County Sheriffs Office, along with county officials, will escort and welcome the 20 bike riders into Napa County.

There are 11 restaurants hosting food stations: Brasswood, Brix Restaurant, Charlie Palmer, The Cliff Familys Bruschetteria, Crisp Kitchen and Juice, Elaine Bell Catering, Heritage Eats, Model Bakery, Mustards Grill, Oakville Grocery and Prabh Indian Kitchen.

Wine will be provided by Honig Vineyard and Winery, Beran, Dutch Henry, Jordan, Luna, St. Supery and Vineyard 29, with cocktails from Charbay. Music for the event will be provided by Groovetronix Productions. Classic Party Rentals is donating all of the party equipment, furnishing and supplies.

Sponsors of this event include Darioush, Trinchero Family Estates, Breakthrough Beverage Group, Chuck Wagner from Caymus Family Wines, David Drucker from Empire Merchants, St Helena Hospital, The Rudd Foundation, American AgCredit, Jelly Belly Candy Company, Jamie Kurtzig and Family, Nomacorc/Vinventions.

Here is the original post:
Honig family planning diabetes fundraiser - Napa Valley Register

Posted in Diabetes | Comments Off on Honig family planning diabetes fundraiser – Napa Valley Register

Exscientia Takes Single Molecules To Multiple Pathways In Diabetes – Seeking Alpha

Posted: June 9, 2017 at 9:45 am

Innovation in diabetes seems to have reached a plateau, with recently launched drugs focusing on combinations and quick- or extended-action formulations. Sanofi's (NYSE:SNY) recent collaboration with private UK group Exscientia is taking drug discovery in a different direction - identifying bispecific small molecules that could work on multiple novel and known pathways.

The collaborators are taking the view that diabetes is not a standalone disorder, with accompanying conditions such as heart disease or obesity offering an opportunity to target mechanisms that work in conjunction with blood-sugar modulation. "We wanted to think about the next generation of diabetes treatment, not just about new pathways - but not just doing fixed dose combinations, and using a single molecule," Exscientia's chief executive Andrew Hopkins tells EP Vantage.

Finding faster

The deal, valued at a total of 250m ($280m), will see Exscientia identifying potential candidate molecules based on chemical compatibility and biological relevance, with research funding provided by Sanofi. The pharma giant will conduct assays, preclinical experiments and clinical trials upon exercise of a licence option on specific molecules.

Exscientia says its artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery platform allows for candidate generation in roughly a quarter of the time of traditional approaches. That will come in handy for Sanofi, for which 2017 will be the last year at the top of the diabetes heap as its long-acting insulin Lantus succumbs to generic competition.

The French group has sought to remain a player, in-licensing agents from Lexicon and Hanmi, though with the exception of a type 1 diabetes vaccine most of its collaborations have involved candidates in classes with well-established competition.

Thus the Exscientia deal represents a strategic shift of sorts, embracing small molecules and novel approaches to treating the condition, and taking a broader view that diabetes is one of a "cluster of morbidities", Mr Hopkins says.

"This potentially opens up ways of segmenting the market and coming up with medicine for these potential comorbidity options," he says. "It fits into the emergent thinking within both companies."

Obesity and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are two comorbidities Mr. Hopkins names, but of course cardiovascular and kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and retinopathy are all complications of diabetes.

As for targets, some may be novel and some well-known, he says: "For some of the innovative targets that have come along and potentially have not shown as much efficacy as one would like, bootstrapping them with a validated target is an approach."

Immuno-oncology

Sanofi is the first big pharma name to show interest in Exscientia's work, but it is not the private group's first collaboration. Exscientia already handed over to Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma one bispecific molecule that selectively activates two G protein-coupled receptors from two distinct families in central nervous system disorders.

And it is working with Evotec on bispecific small molecules focusing on cancer-related adenosine targets with a role in immuno-oncology. At the AACR meeting in April, the partners presented early data on an agent that can antagonise adenosine 2A and CD73.

In oncology, Mr Hopkins believes that small molecule bispecifics might offer a cost-effective alternative to, for example, checkpoint inhibition antibodies used in combination with chemotherapies or other treatment approaches, or emerging cell and gene-based therapies.

Exscientia is now owned by its founders and staff, and has funded expansion through its collaborations, which has also allowed it to measure the productivity of the drug discovery platform. Future expansions, of course, are likely to involve outside investors, although Mr Hopkins declines to give details about when strategic decisions will be made.

Being in the sweet spot of immuno-oncology gives Exscientia a good chance of getting investors to listen to its story. A big pharma partner in Sanofi cannot hurt either. Delivering a couple more clinical candidates quickly to validate the speed of its discovery platform will make Exscientia hard for investors to ignore.

Read the rest here:
Exscientia Takes Single Molecules To Multiple Pathways In Diabetes - Seeking Alpha

Posted in Diabetes | Comments Off on Exscientia Takes Single Molecules To Multiple Pathways In Diabetes – Seeking Alpha

Wolf Evolution and Settled Science – PLoS Blogs (blog)

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:43 am

Are the red and eastern wolves separate species, or hybrids with coyotes? And what has that got to do with climate change? Actually a lot, in illustrating what scientific inquiry is and what it isnt.

COMPARING CANID GENOMES

A report in this weeks Science Advancesquestions conclusions of a 2016 comparison of genome sequencesfrom 28 canids. The distinction between species and hybrid is of practical importance, because the Endangered Species Act circa 1973 doesnt recognize hybrids. But DNA information canrefine species designations or muddy the waters.

At first, genetic marker (SNP) studies hinted at a mixing and matching of genome segments among coyotes, wolves, and dogs. Then came full-fledged genome sequencing.

Last yearBridgett M. vonHoldt, head of Evolutionary Genomics and Ecological Epigenomics at Princeton and colleagues, scrutinized the 28 full genome sequences for signs of lack of unique ancestry. They compared the genomes of 3 domestic dog breeds (boxer, German shepherd, and Basenji), 6 coyotes, a golden jackal from Kenya, and various wolves to 7 reference genomes from 4 Eurasian gray wolves (to minimize recent mutations) and 3 coyotes. The conclusion: lots of genes have flowed from coyotes and gray wolves into the genomes of the animals that became what we call red and eastern wolves, in different proportions.

A bit of background. Red wolves were declared endangered in 1973. A dozen animals, selected by appearance and absence of coyote traits in their young, were captively bred to establish a population in North Carolina that is now several hundred strong. The 3 red wolf genomes evaluated in the 2016 study came from NC. Historically the animals are from the southeastern US. Gray wolves and coyotes, according to the 2016 study, are very close relatives with a recent common ancestry, although theres about as much genetic variability between the two species as within each. Eastern wolves are from the Great Lakes and the Algonquin Park region of Ontario, moving eastward.

Classifying these animals based on geography and visible traits gets confusing, with all the overlaps and shared DNA sequences. Apparently various pairings can successfully mate but probably dont do so very much in the wild when populations are large. Tracking genomes reveals a classic cline, in the parlance of population genetics, with coyote gene introgression into wolf genomes rising from Alaska and Yellowstone (8-8.5%), to the Great Lakes (21.7-23.9%), to Ontario (32.5%-35.5%), and to Quebec (>50%). (BTW the Basenji, the barkless dog, is 61% gray wolf.)

Paul A. Hohenloheof the University of Idaho and colleagues maintain that the 2016 findings actually support 2 hypotheses: recent admixture (hybridization) or that red and eastern wolves are distinct species. Actually its 3: hybridization might have happened a long time ago, something that following genes with known mutation rates might reveal.

The new paper challenges the 28-genome comparison:

The 7 reference genomes were chosen based on the animals physical characteristics and home turf not on some standard coyote or gray wolf genome. So the genomes to which the 28 were compared might not have been pure anything. Two reference coyote genomes were pooled from animals from Alabama and Quebec which might have had some gray wolf genes. Gene flow when animals mate is, after all, a two-way street, sending wolf genes back into coyotes as well as the other way around. The 2016 paper hypothesizes that red wolves are distinct due to genetic drift chance sampling from an ancestral genome but unique ancestry is an alternate explanation. The lack of unique ancestry from the 2016 study doesnt mean it isnt there.

Dr. vonHoldts team respondedto Dr. Hohenlohes teams comments, reiterating that the results show red wolf and eastern wolves are genetically very similar to coyotes or gray wolves, reflecting recent hybridization.

Discussion of wolf classification goes back a quarter century, and this trio of papers is only a recent glimpse of the debate. But I love the respectful back-and-forth of the efforts to extract a compelling narrative from the data that might be what actually happened. Multiple interpretations of the same data and amending interpretations as new data accumulate is the very essence of the scientific process.

ANTI-SCIENCE RHETORIC

Lets reframe the wolf papers using the language of the popular climate change discussion.

Are Hohenlohe and his co-workers coyote deniers?

Do vonHoldt and her colleagues believe in wolf-coyote couplings and Hohenlohe et al dont?

The science of wolf origins is clearly not settled for science is NEVER settled. Facts arent proven, but instead evidence demonstrated and assessed, from both experimentation and observation. The information from tested hypotheses may be so consistent and compelling that it eventually builds to gestate a theory, or even a law, that then explains further observations. But to get there, science is all about asking questions. As Ive written in all 35 or so editions of my various textbooks, science is a cycle of inquiry.

In fact the history of genetics is a chronicle of once-entrenched dogma changing with new experiments and observations. I was in grad school when Walter Gilberts famed Why Genes in Pieces? was published. The classic paper introduced introns, the parts of genes that arent represented in the encoded protein. It was an astonishing idea circa 1978, but with compellingevidence. Yet even Mendels pea crosses sought an alternate explanation for the prevailing notion that traits simply disappear between generations.

Before Im hurled insults, let me assert that although my expertise isnt in climate science, I think that the evidence very strongly supports the hypothesis that the planet is warming at an accelerated rate compared to some other times. And fossil fuel use is likely a partial cause, not just a correlation or association, because the relationship is linear and a mechanism plausible. But I dont believe in global warming as if it is the tooth fairy or a deity.

I cringe when politicians and celebrities appoint and anoint themselves experts on climate change, then use language that illustrates profound unfamiliarity with the ways of science.

Why did Eddie Vedderbegin his speech at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction ceremony for Pearl Jam with climate change is real? Hes a musician, not a meteorologist. Why not, semi-conservative DNA replication is real? Or hydrogen bonds are real? Noble gases are real?

Ive long had a problem with the term climate change, because of course climate changes! Why would it ever be static, given weather ups and downs?

Climate dynamics are a little like the composition of blood, or any other manifestation of biological homeostasis. Have a complete blood countat various times and, if youre healthy, results are likely to be within a narrow normal range. Ditto blood sugar, liver enzymes, serum cholesterol level. But steady blood counts dont mean that the same blood cells hang out forever. Bone marrow stem cells continually pump out blood cell progenitors as the older specialized cells die off. Natural systems change over time, with fluctuations large and small.

Climate always has and always will change.

We can learn about normal blood circulationby studying off-kilter situations leukemia, infection, anemia without fear of being labeled a denier. Its not only a scientifically inappropriate term, but one that is offensive to some, with its echoes of the Holocaust.

Im interested in other times deep, geologic time, not the presidents simplistic reference to the next century when the climate warmed at the rate that it is doing so now. How long did the warming escalate and persist? What forces or events might have precipitated warming? What factors accompanied its ultimate reversal as ice ages neared? By asking questions we can learn what we can expect from nature, so that perhaps we can better understand what we can do to counter the warming trend.

And so those who claim to believe in climate change and vilify those who ask questions might learn a lesson in what science actually is from the elegant discussion of wolf origins.

(Mini book review: for a compelling look at a fictional U.S. embroiled in a second civil war circa 2074-2095 that erupts over fossil fuel use, when Florida is a sea and much of humanity has fled underwater coastal cities for the former midwest, read American War, by Omar El Akkad. I am a voracious reader of dystopian fiction, and this book is hauntingly terrific.)

Read the original here:
Wolf Evolution and Settled Science - PLoS Blogs (blog)

Posted in Alabama Stem Cells | Comments Off on Wolf Evolution and Settled Science – PLoS Blogs (blog)

Puma Biotechnology’s Neratinib Set To Target Extended Adjuvant Opportunity – Seeking Alpha

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:43 am

Puma Biotechnology (NYSE:PBYI) is inching closer to its transformation from a research and development (or R&D) biopharmaceutical company to a full-fledged commercial organization. This company which has in-licensed development and commercialization rights for oral and intravenous formulations of irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor or TKI, neratinib, and also another irreversible TKI, PB357, achieved the first major milestone for 2017 on May 24, 2017. On this day, FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee or ODAC recommended approval for Nerlynx (neratinib) as extended adjuvant therapy for patients suffering with early stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 - positive or HER2-positive breast cancer after being previously treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment with Roche Holdings' (OTCQX:RHHBY) Herceptin (trastuzumab).

Besides this indication, Puma Biotechnology expects neratinib to demonstrate efficacy in other cancers such a non small cell lung cancer and tumors related to expression or over-mutation in HER2 such as HER2-positive cancer, HER-2 cancer that has metastasized to brain, HER2-positive neoadjuvant breast cancer.

Hence, there is high probability that Neratinib can prove to be a blockbuster drug for Puma Biotechnology. I believe this is a solid reason for considering the company as a favorable investment opportunity in 2017. In this article, I will explain the key drivers that make Puma Biotechnology a compelling investment opportunity in 2017.

Extended adjuvant setting is a larger underserved market segment

Currently, the target breast cancer market in extended adjuvant setting comprises around 36,000 patients in USA and 34,000 in EU. In 2015, Herceptin's sales in adjuvant indication were around $4.5 billion to $5.0 billion. All these patients form a target market for neratinib in the following year. Currently, letrozole is the only FDA approved therapy in extended adjuvant setting.

Puma Biotechnology expects to launch Neratinib as extended adjuvant breast cancer therapy in 2017

In July 2016, Puma Biotechnology filed new drug application or NDA with FDA, seeking approval for neratinib in extended adjuvant setting for early stage HER2-overexpressed/amplified breast cancer. The regulatory agency accepted the application in September 2016.

Further, the European Medicines Agency or EMA also validated Puma's application for neratinib in extended adjuvant setting in August 2016. On advice of EMA, in March 2017, the company revised its label to only include those early stage HER2+ breast cancer patients who had been previously treated for up to 1 year with adjuvant herceptin. Puma Biotechnology initiated a managed access program for neratinib in this indication in Q4 2016 and an expanded access program in Q1 2017.

While all these have been major milestones for the company in the past, the upcoming milestone will be FDA approval for orally administered neratinib in extended adjuvant setting, anticipated in 3Q 2017.

This approval is expected to be mainly based on results obtained from phase 3 trial, ExteNET, in which neratinib managed to hit its primary endpoints. In the intent-to-treat or ITT population, the 2-year disease free survival or DFS in neratinib arm was seen to be 93.9% while that in the placebo arm was 91.6%, which implies absolute improvement of 2.4%. In ITT population, there has been a 2.5% absolute improvement in 5-year DFS for neratinib arm as compared to placebo arm.

In case of patients confirmed with HER+ breast cancer, neratinib demonstrated 2-year DFS of 94.7%, while it was only 90.6% for the placebo arm. While this is an absolute improvement of 4.1%, the 5-year DFS with neratinib in HER+ patients is slightly higher at 4.4%.

Data from ExteNET trial has also shown 33% reduction in risk of disease recurrence for patients in neratinib arm as compared to those in placebo arm in ITT population. Further, for confirmed HER+ early stage breast cancer patients, the reduction in risk of disease recurrence for those on neratinib therapy in extended adjuvant setting is as high as 49%.

All these statistics are in line with those seen for the already approved extended adjuvant breast cancer drug, letrozole, as well as data obtained from development trials for hormone receptor positive or HR+ adjuvant breast cancer therapies, Pfizer's (NYSE:PFE) Aromasin and AstraZeneca's (NYSE:AZN) Arimidex. This implies that there are high chances for neratinib to secure FDA approval in extended adjuvant setting.

Neratinib has demonstrated higher benefit as adjuvant therapy in HR+ breast cancer patients

For HR+ breast cancer patients in ExteNET trial, the adjuvant therapy of neratinib demonstrated DFS rate of 95.4%, while the placebo arm showed DFS of 91.2%. This implied an absolute benefit of 4.2% after 2 years.

For 5-year period, the DFS with neratinib in HR+ patients was 91.7% while that in placebo arm was 86.9%, implying 4.8% absolute benefit.

Neratinib has demonstrated superior results in HR+ patients mainly on account of dual suppression of the crosstalk between estrogen receptor-positive or ER+ and HER+. Since ER+ breast cancer patients in the ExteNET trial were already on background endocrine therapy, it helped suppress the ER while neratinib suppressed both EGFR and HER2. This dual suppression has been seen only in neratinib and not in trials of other breast cancer drugs such Roche Holdings Herceptin and Novartis' (NYSE:NVS) Tykerb.

In case of HR- patients, however, ExteNET trial demonstrated improvement with neratinib between months 0 to 12 as compared to placebo. This was essentially when the patients were being administered the drug. However, the benefit in DFS in the neratinib arm over placebo arm seemed to become statistically insignificant over 5 year horizon.

Puma Biotechnology has also introduced loperamide prophylaxis therapy to prevent diarrhea resulting from neratinib.

Prior to Puma Biotechnology in-licensing Neratinib, it was being tested on 3,000 patients in various trials. It was seen that these patients suffered from grade 3 or grade 4 diarrhea in the first 28 days after initiating therapy. However, this could be treated with antidiarrheal drug, loperamide.

Puma Biotechnology is instead focusing on preventing this side-effect of neratinib using loperamide prophylaxis. Data from multiple studies has shown that the rate of grade 3 diarrhea reduced from the range of 30% to 53% in case of no loperamide prophylaxis to the range of 0% to 17% with loperamide prophylaxis. The total duration of diarrhea also dropped from 14 days to 2 days with loperamide prophylaxis.

Since ExteNET trial did not involve any anti-diarrheal prophylaxis therapy, Puma Biotechnology separately studied the impact of loperamide prophylaxis alone and in combination with other anti-inflammatory agents in extended adjuvant setting in early stage HER2+ breast cancer patients in another phase 2 trial, CONTROL. Data from this trial showed that while rate of grade 3 diarrhea in ExteNET trial was 39.8%, loperamide prophylaxis reduced the rate to 30.7%, loperamide and budesonide prophylaxis to 23.4%, and loperamide and colestipol to 11.5%.

Further, while the duration of diarrhea in ExteNET trial was 59 days, the various prophylaxis regimens in the CONTROL trial have brought the down to the range of 8 to 12 days. Episodes of diarrhea were also brought down from 8 in ExteNET trial to the range of 2 to 4 in CONTROL trial.

The CONTROL trial has also shown improvement in tolerability for the drug, which was being mainly affected due to diarrhea.

All this shows that the major side-effect of Neratinib, diarrhea, is easily manageable with effective prophylaxis therapy. Further, it is only seen that grade 3 diarrhea was witnessed by patients only in first cycle or first 28 days of neratinib therapy.

The company's cash reserves can sustain its operations through mid-2018

At the end of Q1 2017, Puma Biotechnology had $194 million worth cash reserves on its balance sheet. The company's cash burn rate in Q1 2017 was $36.0 million. This can be considered representative for all the quarters in 2017, as Puma has been highly involved in preparing for regulatory approval and commercial launch of neratinib. Based on these assumptions, the company can sustain its business operations upto the first half of 2018, without depending on external funding.

Further, with a solid oncology drug in the pipeline, Puma Biotechnology will also not find it difficult to raise capital from the public, either as equity or debt. Hence, the company seems to be at a comfortable position.

Investors should not ignore certain company-specific risks

Today, Puma Biotechnology is equivalent to neratinib. In absence of any commercial product or advanced stage research product, Puma Biotechnology is excessively dependent on the successful commercial launch of Neratinib. Since the product has not yet received FDA approval for even a single indication, this may prove to be too risky investment for investors with average risk appetite.

Further, the company also does not have proven marketing and distribution capabilities. In absence of a strong commercial partner, Puma Biotechnology may land up being commercially unsuccessful, despite securing FDA approval for neratinib.

Investors should consider these major risk factors while considering Puma Biotechnology as an opportunity in 2017.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Go here to read the rest:
Puma Biotechnology's Neratinib Set To Target Extended Adjuvant Opportunity - Seeking Alpha

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Puma Biotechnology’s Neratinib Set To Target Extended Adjuvant Opportunity – Seeking Alpha

Global $92.9 Billion Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical Services Outsourcing Market Analysis, By Service And Segment … – PR Newswire (press release)

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:43 am

The global biotechnology services outsourcing market is expected to reach USD 92.9 billion by 2025

Pharmaceutical industry has been adaptive of the function of outsourcing certain clinical and corporate functions as early as 2002. Among the services outsourced, clinical trial management and contract manufacturing were the forerunners. For instance, Johnson & Johnson was the first pharmaceutical company to outsource its applications development and maintenance (ADM).

In 2015, over USD 50.0 billion was spent on pharmaceutical R&D activities majorly on oncology, diabetes, and autoimmune therapy classes, which is expected to propel the biotechnology services outsourcing market growth over the forecast period.

Shrinking profit margins coupled with rising competition in the market space, and augmenting regulatory burden are other vital impact rendering factors. The pharmaceutical services outsourcing market is expected to register growth at a CAGR of 8.7% during the forecast period. On the other hand, pending immigration legislations in the U.S. may hinder business economics and outsourcing risks.

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in Europe are significantly investing in R&D in the recent year owing to rising demand for advanced medicines. This may be attributed to increasing aging population, incidence of chronic diseases, and communicable diseases.

Further key findings from the study suggest:

Key Topics Covered:

1 Research Methodology

2 Executive Summary

3 Pharmaceutical/Biotechnology Services Outsourcing Market Variables, Trends, & Scope 3.8 Service pricing analysis

4 Pharmaceutical/Biotechnology Services Outsourcing Market: Service Estimates & Trend Analysis 4.1 Pharmaceutical/biotechnology services outsourcing market: Service movement analysis 4.2 Consulting services 4.2.2 Regulatory compliance 4.2.3 Remediation 4.2.4 Quality management 4.2.5 Other 4.3 Auditing & assessment 4.4 Regulatory affairs services 4.4.2 Clinical trial applications & product registration 4.4.3 Regulatory writing & publishing 4.4.4 Legal representation 4.4.5 Other 4.5 Product maintenance services 4.6 Product design & development 4.7 Product testing & validation 4.8 Training & education 4.9 Other services

5 Pharmaceutical/Biotechnology Services Outsourcing Market: Regional Estimates & Trend Analysis

6 Competitive Landscape

For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/5b9f3q/biotechnologyphar

Media Contact:

Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-929-billion-biotechnologypharmaceutical-services-outsourcing-market-analysis-by-service-and-segment-forecasts-2014---2025---research-and-markets-300470992.html

SOURCE Research and Markets

http://www.researchandmarkets.com

More:
Global $92.9 Billion Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical Services Outsourcing Market Analysis, By Service And Segment ... - PR Newswire (press release)

Posted in Biotechnology | Comments Off on Global $92.9 Billion Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical Services Outsourcing Market Analysis, By Service And Segment … – PR Newswire (press release)

Imaging technique shows molecular machinery at work – Phys.Org

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:42 am

June 8, 2017 by Geri Clark The camera-based imaging platform Scott Blanchard and his team developed to track how individual proteins, called G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), respond to their environments. Credit: Dr. Daniel Terry/Weill Cornell Medicine

New imaging methods that allow researchers to track the individual protein molecules on the surface of cells have been developed by Weill Cornell Medicine investigators. The results offer unprecedented insight into how cells sense and respond to their environments.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are proteins that reside within the cellular membrane and relay signals into the cell to regulate fundamental aspects of human physiology. The signals received through GPCRs include everything from light, which activates the proteins in cells that enable vision, to chemicals such as neurotransmitters that regulate mood, to signals that trigger pain. Nearly half of all clinically used drugs work by targeting distinct GPCRs.

"These proteins are critical to every aspect of human physiology," said co-senior study author Scott Blanchard, professor of physiology and biophysics at Weill Cornell Medicine. "We need to know how GPCRs recognize all of these signals, how they process the signals and how they transmit the information into the cell to invoke a specific action. Only in doing so will we be able to develop new generations of drugs that more accurately target these proteins and thus can help without causing collateral damage."

In a paper published June 7 in Nature, Blanchard and colleagues at Weill Cornell Medicine, Stanford and Columbia Universities describe an important advance in this direction, achieved with the use of an imaging technique called single-molecule Fluorescence Energy Transfer (smFRET) that allowed the researchers to watch individual GPCR molecules as they responded to molecules of adrenaline, a hormone that controls functions including heartbeat, breathing and dilation of blood vessels.

"We knew already that the GPCR molecule physically changes upon binding adrenaline and that this process enables it to bind intracellular proteins," Blanchard said. "What we didn't know much about is how this activation process actually happens. And that's the critical missing information that has limited our understanding of drug efficacy."

To enable them to view this process, Blanchard's team developed new reporter molecules called fluorophores that emit fluorescent light and can be attached to the GPCR to inform on its motions when adrenaline binds. The Blanchard lab also developed a new microscope that can follow these light messages with greater accuracy. The researchers then watched and recorded the movements, using complex computation to learn how the protein responds to its interactions with adrenaline and with another protein in the cell, called heterotrimeric G protein, which senses the response and lets the cell know that the GPCR has been activated by adrenaline.

The result is a high-resolution, high-speed film that reveals the details of the molecular relationships that transmit the adrenaline signal through the GPCR into the cell. This revealed to the research team for the first time a series of reversible steps in the process by which an activated GPCR interacts with its intracellular G protein that have never been seen before. This allowed them to conclude their paper by describing why "Quantitative single-molecule imaging investigations will be crucial in . delineating distinct ligand-dependent GPCR signaling pathways."

"These are important insights that wouldn't be possible without the imaging techniques that increase our understanding of how these molecular machines actually work and how signals are conveyed from the outside to the inside of the cell," said Blanchard, who is on related patents, including a patent licensed to Lumidyne for one of the fluorophores used in the study. Blanchard is a co-founder with equity in Lumidyne, a company that focuses on fluorescence technologies. "Being able to see the inner workings of the GPCRs has enormous implications for drug discovery for everything from pain management to heart disease and cancer. The clinical implications of this technology can reach very far."

Explore further: Cholesterol may help proteins pair up to transmit signals across cell membranes

More information: G. Glenn Gregorio et al. Single-molecule analysis of ligand efficacy in 2ARG-protein activation, Nature (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nature22354

Journal reference: Nature

Provided by: Cornell University

Cholesterol may act as a selective glue that binds proteins into paired structures that enable human cells to respond to outside signals, according to a new study in PLOS Computational Biology.

Researchers at the University of Michigan, Stanford University and biotech company ConfometRx have captured the first cryo-electron microscopy snapshots of a key cellular receptor in action.

Researchers from Charit Universittsmedizin Berlin have been studying two proteins that play a vital role in many bodily processes. The aim of the research was to establish how G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ...

(Phys.org)A research team at Weill Cornell Medical College has solved the 3D crystal structure of a member protein in one of the most important classes of human proteinsthe G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These ...

For the first time, scientists from the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) have created detailed "fingerprints" of a class of surface receptors that have proven highly useful for drug development.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell surface receptors in our cells, involved in signal transmission across the cell membrane. One of the biggest questions is how a signal recognized at the extracellular ...

(Phys.org)One of the greatest challenges in generating energy from renewable sources is finding a way to store the continuously fluctuating energy being produced. Batteries, supercapacitors, and most other energy-storage ...

New imaging methods that allow researchers to track the individual protein molecules on the surface of cells have been developed by Weill Cornell Medicine investigators. The results offer unprecedented insight into how cells ...

Scientists and engineers from the University of Bath have developed biodegradable cellulose microbeads from a sustainable source that could potentially replace harmful plastic ones that contribute to ocean pollution.

Calcium carbonate, or CaCO3, comprises more than 4% of the earth's crust. Its most common natural forms are chalk, limestone, and marble, produced by the sedimentation of the shells of small fossilized snails, shellfish, ...

Using the principles behind the formation of sandcastles from wet sand, North Carolina State University researchers have achieved 3-D printing of flexible and porous silicone rubber structures through a new technique that ...

A team of chemists in Canada has developed a way to process metals without using toxic solvents and reagents.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

The rest is here:
Imaging technique shows molecular machinery at work - Phys.Org

Posted in Cell Medicine | Comments Off on Imaging technique shows molecular machinery at work – Phys.Org

CBSET Expands Its Preclinical Research Services by Adding GLP-Compliant Cell-Based-Therapies Support Capability – Business Wire (press release)

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:42 am

LEXINGTON, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--CBSET Inc., a non-profit GLP translational research institute that specializes in the advancement of novel therapies, announced today that it has expanded its preclinical cell therapy offerings. CBSET recognizes the importance of preclinical partners capable of supporting the needs of the rapidly advancing cell therapy field by providing technical and regulatory support services in the cell therapy and regenerative medicine sectors.

In vivo assessments include (1) stem cell-derived lines, (2) engineered cell lines, (3) autologous strategies, (4) engineered tissues and tissue products, and (5) combination products.

Scientific progress in the cell therapy and regenerative medicine world has advanced rapidly in the last decade, and the need for experienced preclinical support services with translational experience has never been greater for investigators in these fields, said Michael Naimark, CBSETs Director of Business Development. Novel cell and tissue therapies require expanded technical and regulatory approaches to ensure an appropriate level of project support.

Our status as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research institute and our long track record of safety assessments and successful regulatory submissions give our collaborations impeccable credibility, Naimark added. Applying this experience to support translational programs in regenerative medicine will allow our partners to focus on the scientific integrity of their technology, rather than the conduct and documentation of their critical preclinical projects.

Prior to establishing the new service, CBSET appointed Michael Naimark as Director of Business Development in October 2016. Most recently, he had been employed by the Neural Stem Cell Institute (NSCI) as project manager overseeing the development of a cell-based therapy for macular degeneration under a 4-year award from the New York Stem Cell Foundation.

Michaels significant hands-on experience in managing complex preclinical studies in a variety of animal models puts him in a unique position to interact on CBSETs behalf with existing and potential new sponsors about study goals and regulatory requirements. His industry experience and knowledge of cell-based and biologics therapies are a valuable addition to the CBSET team, said Peter Markham, CEO.

CBSET will launch its new cell-based therapies service at next weeks ISSCR 2017 Annual Meeting in Boston, June 14-17. Visitors to the CBSET Exhibit Booth (#843) can receive a copy of Cell-Based Therapy and FDA Review: Partnering for Success at Your Pre-IND Meeting, meet Mr. Naimark and learn more about CBSETs multi-disciplinary paradigm for in vivo cell-based therapy assessments.

Expert Biomedical Research Services

CBSET was conceived to enable the advancement of novel therapeutics, devices and techniques through ongoing collaboration with its sponsors in the biomedical research community. CBSET provides a full range of GLP (Good Laboratory Practice) and non-GLP research services to support early target validation, lead optimization, and safety and efficacy testing. Whether a Sponsor is developing a new device, surgical model, or needs support for its drug development programs, CBSET offers a wide array of preclinical resources to meet these needs.

For more information about CBSET, contact Michael Naimark, Director of Business Development: +1-781-541-5627, mnaimark@cbset.org

About CBSET CBSET Inc. 500 Shire Way, Lexington, Mass. is the preclinical research leader in critically important therapeutic fields such as interventional cardiology, renal disease and dialysis, chronic drug-resistant hypertension, womens health, minimally invasive surgery, orthopedics, biological and synthetic tissue repair, drug delivery, bioresorbable devices, and combination medical device and drug-eluting products. Learn more about CBSETs expert biomedical research services or please contact us.

Originally posted here:
CBSET Expands Its Preclinical Research Services by Adding GLP-Compliant Cell-Based-Therapies Support Capability - Business Wire (press release)

Posted in Cell Medicine | Comments Off on CBSET Expands Its Preclinical Research Services by Adding GLP-Compliant Cell-Based-Therapies Support Capability – Business Wire (press release)

CAR T-cell therapy Why it’s too soon to speculate about a ‘cure’ for multiple myeloma – HealthNewsReview.org

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:42 am

Kathlyn Stone is an associate editor at HealthNewsReview.org. She tweets as @KatKStone.

An experimental immunotherapy treatment for multiple myeloma from a biotech company in China captured wide attention at the just-concluded American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting.

Weve been following news reports from the meeting closely since it kicked off last Friday:

ASCOs news release on the new treatment, a form of CAR T-cell therapy, noted that the phase 1 results are preliminary and that the small trial was short-term. But then it blew past those cautions by speculating that the treatment could send multiple myeloma into long-term remission and might represent a cure for this incurable disease. The treatment costs werent included, either.

Andrae Vandross, MD, a hematology/oncology fellow at UCLA and a contributor to HealthNewsReview.org, said the news release had some important details, such as a discussion of adverse events, particularlycytokine release syndrome (CRS), which affected many patients.

But overall, I wish more attention was paid to the fact that this small trial was to examine safety and efficacy and that much more needs to be done to make statements regarding clinically meaningful impact on disease, Vandross said.

The shortcomings of the news release can be found repeated in some of the news coverage.

Reuterss story, Chinese cell therapy effective in small multiple myeloma trial didnt explain harms well nor mention costs.

FierceBiotechs article played up the horse race aspect of the pharmaceutical industry where competing companies race to get media and investor attention for their preliminary research, ASCO dark horse Nanjing Legend Biotech shines with promising CAR-T data. But costs didnt make it into the discussion.

Nor was the price tag mentioned in The Scientists piece, CAR T-Cell trials boast promising results.

Deborah Korenstein, MD, an internist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, who did attend the meeting, found some of the reports on the CAR-T study lacking.

None of these articles mentions cost, though CAR-T therapy is very expensive. They do note that the follow-up is short-term so far, though they also talk about long-term remission (in the case of the Reuters piece) or cure (in the ASCO press release), which at the very least sends a mixed message.

NBC News piece, CAR-T Cancer Approach Has Surprising Success in Multiple Myeloma, reflects some of this mixed messaging.After reporting that the results were impressive and remarkable and that the study brings hope of a possible cure, the NBC story eventually broaches the issues of adverse effects and costs: The treatment is expected to cost $200,000 to $300,000, and whos going to pay for that is a big issue, according to a study author.

What does Korenstein think news organizations and public relations people could do better?

Stick to the evidence at hand, avoid speculating about outcomes that havent been determined, and make sure that potential harms are described as thoroughly as benefits.

Certainly there is no evidence so far to support those claims about longer term outcomes. They say it in a hedgy way but to me they shouldnt be mentioning it at all. They also play down the fact that the huge majority of patients had CRS, even if it was often not severe which is generally defined as requiring hospitalization. Its not clear here what severe means.

Dr. Korenstein disclosed that her spouse consults for Vedanta Biosciences.

Kevin Lomangino is the managing editor of HealthNewsReview.org. He tweets as @KLomangino. You'll be tempted

This week we begin a slow roll-out of a new offer of help to those

Today kicks off the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the world's

See the rest here:
CAR T-cell therapy Why it's too soon to speculate about a 'cure' for multiple myeloma - HealthNewsReview.org

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on CAR T-cell therapy Why it’s too soon to speculate about a ‘cure’ for multiple myeloma – HealthNewsReview.org

Novartis touts new T-cell therapy data in race for FDA approval – Reuters

Posted: June 8, 2017 at 9:42 am

ZURICH Novartis on Wednesday touted new data from its T-cell therapy CTL019, saying it is on a par with results of experimental molecules from Kite Pharma and Juno Therapeutics that also target aggressive blood cancers.

Three months after infusion, the overall response rate (ORR)among 51 adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was 45 percent, Novartis said, with 37 percent complete responses (CR), or no sign of disease.

Novartis aims for $1 billion in annual sales for CTL019, a drug made by taking T cells from a patient, reprogramming them in the lab to fight cancer, and re-infusing them. The field is crowded, with Kite and Juno also hunting for approval for drugs whose per-patient costs could top $500,000.

"When you look across the three competitors' data sets, they're all in a similar range of responses," Novartis drug development chief Vas Narasimhan said in an interview. "What's critical is to see the data sets fully mature... and look at the overall safety profile."

Narasimhan said no deaths were linked to CTL019, though three patients died from disease progression within 30 days of infusion. Seven suffered severe neurological events.

While so-called "CAR-T therapies" from Novartis, Kite and Juno are now last resorts for patients who have failed other treatments, more doctors are growing convinced they have promise. Globally, there are some 183 CAR-T trials underway.

In March, Novartis filed CTL019 with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for fast-track approval in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in young patients. The FDA has scheduled a July 12 public meeting for that.

Novartis could file for FDA approval in DLBCL, the most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in adults, around October, with European filings planned about the same time.

Rival Kite Pharma's experimental drug axi-cel is also under expedited U.S. review against advanced NHL, with additional trials underway in leukaemia patients.

Kite has said 41 percent of NHL patients responded to axi-cel treatment at the six-month cutoff, with 36 percent in complete response.

Though Juno Therapeutics has suffered significant setbacks -- patient deaths forced it to abandon its lead CAR-T molecule this year -- the company released fresh data last week on another drug, JCAR017, against NHL.

Novartis is studying why some patients respond to CTL019 while others' cancers avoid detection.

Additional trials are planned, including with newer CAR-Ts combined with other drugs.

"There's just a lot of science that's yet to be understood," Narasimhan said. "I hope we have better answers next year ... for what's going on in the non-responders."

(Reporting by John Miller, editing by Louise Heavens)

BRUSSELS The European Union's top court barred Germany's Dextro Energy on Thursday from making claims about the health benefits of glucose contained in its products, which include Dextrose tablets.

JOHANNESBURG South Africa said on Thursday it was suspending all trade in birds and chicken products from neighboring Zimbabwe after it reported an outbreak of highly pathogenic H5N8 bird flu at a commercial poultry farm.

Follow this link:
Novartis touts new T-cell therapy data in race for FDA approval - Reuters

Posted in Cell Therapy | Comments Off on Novartis touts new T-cell therapy data in race for FDA approval – Reuters

Page 1,481«..1020..1,4801,4811,4821,483..1,4901,500..»