Stem    cells          
        Arthur Caplan, Ph.D        NBC News        contributor      
    5 hours ago  
    What should we think when a scientist claims to have found a    cell in the human body with miraculous powers that no one    before has ever seen and almost no one else can even find    trying to follow his directions of where to look?  
    The small number of scientific proponents of the miraculous    healing powers of a controversial form of stem cells called    VSELSvery small embryonic-like stem cells -- are facing this    very question. The usual answer is that, at best, the claim    must be the product of wishful thinking, or at worst, fraud.  
    A just published study by the distinguished stem cell biologist    Irving Weissman of Stanford Universitys School of Medicine    says he and his team could not find VSELS or corroborate their    alleged regenerative power. The Catholic Church, because of its    opposition to embryo destruction to obtain stem cells for    research, gave its blessings and money to VSELS therapy so it    also now finds itself up to its miters in controversy.  
    A few years ago in early November 2011, I was lucky enough to be asked to attend a    meeting on stem cell research at the Vatican. Key officials    there had decided that worldwide battles over the ethics of    using of embryonic stem cells merited a gathering of scientists    and prominent Catholic theologians. To no ones surprise    including mine, the meeting was designed as a celebration of    the power of adult stem cellsnaturally occurring cells in your    body that can regenerate damaged tissue or grow new cells     including bone marrow, hair follicle cells and the lining of    the gut and liver cells. The Vatican wanted these and only    these kinds of cells to be used to cure now intractable    diseases such as spinal cord injury, diabetes and heart    disease. Those doctors and scientists who favored studying    cells taken from human embryos, which meant their destruction,    which also can regenerate many different kinds of cells, got    little airtime and no ethical traction.  
    One of the strangest moments at the conference came when    Polish-born researcher Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, now on the faculty    at the University of Louisville, stood up and told the    enthralled bishops, priests, monsignors, cardinals, theologians    and the few other odd ducks like me that he had found very tiny    cells residing in adult cells that behaved just like embryos.    Ratajczak said they could develop into all manner of other    cells, thereby acting as natural repair kits, given the right    conditions and genetic tweaking.  
    The theologians were delighted. They were so excited that they    took the unprecedented step of investing the churchs money in    a company, Neostem, to help develop Ratajczaks discovery. His    VSELS would provide an ethical way to use stem cells to cure    disease while getting the Church out of a horrible    bindcondemning embryo destruction for obtaining stem cells    while so many worldwide suffered premature death and serious    disability.  
    Weissman thinks VSELS are nothing more than cell debris and    fragments from dying cells. He does not believe "that VSELs    have the potentials claimed, he wrote in the study, and doubts    that these cells have potential for clinical application in    humans. Weissman study is now the fourth to fail to find the    miracle VSELS or to be able to show any evidence of their    regenerative healing power.  
Read this article:
Bioethicist: Failed search for controversial form of stem cells shows danger of mixing science, religion