Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jan-Feb;              46(1): 1018.            
          Department of University Health Network, Toronto Western          Hospital, Toronto, Canada, ON M5T 2S8        
          This is an open-access article distributed under the          terms of the Creative Commons          Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which          permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction          in any medium, provided the original work is properly          cited.        
      Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition      associated with significant functional and sensory deficits,      emotional, social, and financial burdens, and an increased      risk of cardiovascular complications, deep vein thrombosis,      osteoporosis, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, and      neuropathic pain.    
      The estimated annual global incidence of SCI is 1540 cases      per million. In the USA, approximately 1.275 million      individuals are affected, with over 12,000 new cases each      year.15 The most common causes of      traumatic SCI are road traffic accidents, falls, occupational      and sports-related injuries that result in contusion and      compression of the spinal cord.1      Approximately 55% of SCIs occur at the cervical level (C1 to      C7-T1) with a mortality of 10% in the first year following      injury and an expected lifespan of only 1015 years      post-injury, and thoracic (T1T11), thoracolumbar (T11T12 to      L1L2) and lumbosacral (L2S5) injuries each account for      approximately 15% of SCI.14 Depending on the      age of the patient, severity, and levels of SCI, the lifetime      cost of health care and other injury-related expenses can      reach $25 million.15    
      Despite advances in pre-hospital care, medical and surgical      management and rehabilitation approaches, many SCI sufferers      still experience substantial neurological disability.      Intensive efforts are underway to develop effective      neuroprotective and regenerative strategies.    
      SCI involves a primary (the physical injury) and a secondary      injury (the subsequent cascade of molecular and cellular      events which amplify the original injury).6 The primary injury damages      both upper and lower motor neurons and disrupts motor,      sensory and autonomic functions. Pathophysiological processes      occurring in the secondary injury phase are rapidly      instigated in response to the primary injury in an attempt to      homeostatically control and minimize the damage.      Paradoxically, this response is largely responsible for      exacerbating the initial damage and creating an inhibitory      milieu that prevents endogenous efforts of repair,      regeneration and remyelination. These secondary processes      include inflammation, ischemia, lipid peroxidation,      production of free radicals, disruption of ion channels,      axonal demyelination, glial scarring (astrogliosis), necrosis      and programmed cell death. Nevertheless, endogenous repair      and regenerative mechanisms during the secondary phase of      injury minimize the extent of the lesion (through      astrogliosis), reorganize blood supply through angiogenesis,      clear cellular debris, and reunite and remodel damaged neural      circuits. The spatial and temporal dynamics of these      secondary mediators7 are fundamental to SCI      pathophysiology and as such offer exploitable targets for      therapeutic intervention.    
      A multitude of characteristics of cells tested pre-clinically      and clinically make them attractive to potentially address      the multifactorial nature of the pathophysiology of secondary      SCI  they are anti-inflammatory,      immunomodulatory,812      anti-gliotic,13      pro-oligodendrogliogenic,14      pro-neuronogenic,15 and secrete various      anti-apoptotic and pro-angiogenic neurotrophic factors. Given      the pathophysiological targets of SCI,7 transplanted      cells should: 1) enable regenerating axons to cross barriers;      2) functionally replace lost cells; and/or 3) create an      environment supportive of neural repair.16      However, given the multifactorial nature of SCI and its      dynamic pathophysiological consequences, the success of      future clinical trials of cell therapy will likely depend on      the informed co-administration of multiple strategies,      including pharmacological and rehabilitation      therapies.7    
      Different sources and types of cells have been and/or are      being tested in clinical trials for SCI, including embryonic      stem cells (ESCs), neural progenitor cells (NPCs), bone      marrow mesenchymal cells (BMSCs) and non-stem cells such as      olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells.17 Other cell types are      being developed for the clinic, including other sources of      mesenchymal cells (fetal blood,18 adipose      tissue, umbilical cord1936), adult21,37 and      immortalized neural progenitors (PISCES, NCT01151124),      skin-derived progenitors,3847 induced pluripotent stem      cells4852 and endogenous spinal      cord progenitors5358 []. The advantages and      disadvantages of each cell source and type being considered      or already in clinical trials for SCI have been extensively      described and compared elsewhere,17,5963 and reflect their      potential in the clinic []. There are currently more than a      dozen cell therapy clinical trials for SCI listed on      clinicaltrials.gov.64 Most are Phase I or I/II      clinical safety and feasibility studies, indicating that      cellular treatments for SCI developed in the laboratory are      still in the very early stages of clinical translation.    
          A comparison of the different cell types and          sources currently in (*) or under consideration for          clinical trials for SCI        
Continued here:
Current stem cell treatments for spinal cord injury