On September 7, 2022, the United States Department of Agricultures Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) announced the completion of the first Regulatory Status Review (RSR) of a genetically engineered plant under the SECURE rule. APHIS concluded that a new genetically engineered tomato produced by Norfolk Plant Sciences is unlikely to pose an increased plant pest risk compared to a conventional tomato, and is therefore not subject to regulation under the SECURE rule. This means that these tomato plants, which have been engineered to produce deep purple tomatoes with enhanced nutritional quality, may be legally imported, moved interstate, or released into the environment (including, for example, in a field trial) in the United States without a permit from APHIS.
Notably, this finding also means that subsequent genetic transformation events involving the same combination of plant species, trait, and mechanism of action (PTMOA) as Norfolk Plant Sciences purple tomatoes are also no longer regulated under the SECURE rule. Thus, other subspecies and varieties of Solanum lycopersicum that have been modified to produce the same trait by the same mechanism of actioneven if by different transgenic eventsare now exempt under 340.1(c) of the SECURE rule. More information on this so-called PTMOA exemption is available in APHISs Guide for Requesting a Confirmation of Exemption from Regulations under 7 CFR part 340 (published August 31, 2022; document ID BRS-GD-2020-0001). This approach is different from the event-by-event regulation that was previously required, and represents the first time that APHIS has made an RSR determination under its new rules.
Additional information about the contours of the SECURE rule and the genetic engineering that Norfolk Plant Sciences used to produce their purple tomato is provided below.
About the SECURE Rule
The SECURE rule (7 CFR part 340) governs how APHIS regulates certain organisms developed using genetic engineering, with the goal of protecting U.S. agriculture from plant pest risks under the Plant Protection Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.). It replaced the previous version of 7 CFR part 340, which had been in place largely unchanged since APHISs biotechnology regulations were established in 1987, in phases between May 18, 2020 and October 1, 2021.
The new regulations completely overhauled and streamlined the regulatory process for assessing the plant pest risk of organisms developed using genetic engineering, taking into account advances in scientific understanding, and focusing more on the properties of the engineered organism and less on the method(s) used to produce it.
The revised regulations exempt certain types of modifications from regulation; such exemptions are self-determined, though developers may voluntarily request confirmation from APHIS that a given exemption applies. This exemption/confirmation process replaced the previous Am I Regulated? process on June 17, 2020, and APHIS has since issued 15 confirmation letters as of this writing, with the earliest in April 2021.
However, no plant had made it through the new RSR process until now. The RSR process is an option for instances in which no SECURE rule exemptions apply to a given engineered plant, but the developer feels that the plant nonetheless does not pose an increased plant pest risk and should therefore not be regulated by the SECURE rule. The RSR process replaced the previous petition process for requesting deregulation from 7 CFR part 340 due to low likelihood of posing a plant pest risk.
The RSR process became available for corn, soybean, cotton, potato, tomato, and alfalfa on April 5, 2021, and for all other plant species on October 1, 2021. APHIS received Norfolk Plant Sciences RSR request on August 4, 2021 and responded on September 6, 2022 (both the request and the response documents are available here, under RSR number 21-166-01rsr). As of this writing, Norfolk Plant Sciences tomato is the only RSR request publicly available on APHISs website.
Under the RSR process, APHIS reviews the biological properties of the plant; and the trait (or new characteristic); and the mechanism of action (or how the genetic modification causes the new trait to occur) in order to evaluate plant pest risk. There are two potential steps to this process, depending on what APHIS determines during the first step. In Step 1, APHIS identifies whether the engineered plant poses a plausible pathway to increased plant pest risk compared to a comparator plant. If APHIS finds no such pathway, the RSR process concludes, and APHIS notifies the requestor that the plant in question is not subject to regulation under the SECURE rule. This was the outcome for Norfolk Plant Sciences tomato.
On the other hand, if APHIS does determine that the engineered plant may plausibly pose an increased plant pest risk, there are several potential next steps. First, the developer may accept that the plant is regulated under the SECURE rule, and then either request a permit before moving or releasing the plant, or take no further action and not move or release the plant. Alternatively or additionally, the developer may request that APHIS proceed to Step 2 of the RSR process, which entails a more involved review, subsequent publication in the Federal Register, and solicitation and review of public comments before a final determination. As of this writing, no plant has gone through this second step of the RSR process.
About the Purple Tomato
As described in its RSR request, Norfolk Plant Sciences created its purple tomato plant by Agrobacterium-mediated insertional mutagenesis of the MicroTom tomato variety, and subsequent crossing into other tomato varieties. The plants are engineered to increase expression of their natural anthocyanin pigments, which is what causes the fruits to have a deep purple color and also enhances their nutritional value.
Specifically, the inserted DNA contains two transcription factors from the snapdragon plant (Antirrhinum majus), which serve to activate production of the tomatos native anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, causing increased anthocyanin production. Each of these two transcription factor genes, called Del and Ros1, is expressed from the T-DNA under a native tomato promotor that causes fruit-specific expression. The T-DNA also includes the nptII selectable marker with a promotor and terminator from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which have a decades-long history of safe use and consumption.
Complete genome sequencing revealed that the T-DNA was inserted at a single site in chromosome 4, accompanied by several small deletions. Phenotypic evaluation of the transformed plants revealed that they grew effectively the same as non-transgenic tomatoes, except that they produce deep purple fruit with significantly higher anthocyanin content. Photos of the plants and fruit are available in the published RSR request.
APHIS considered the information disclosed in Norfolk Plant Sciences RSR request, alongside publicly available resources, and APHIS familiarity with tomato and knowledge of the trait, phenotype, and mechanism of action and did not identify any plausible pathway by which [the] modified tomato, or any of its sexually compatible relatives, would pose an increased plant pest risk relative to a comparator tomato (21-116-01 RSR Response, page 1). As such, APHIS concluded that these purple tomatoes are not subject to regulation under the SECURE rule.
Other Regulatory Agencies
It is important to note that deregulation from APHISs SECURE rule does not mean that the plant is wholly removed from U.S. federal regulatory oversight. For example, regulations implemented by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and/or other arms of USDA (such as Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) import and export regulations, and/or Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) labeling requirements) may still apply. Along those lines, Norfolk Plant Sciences RSR request states that Norfolk Plant Sciences submitted a food and feed safety and nutritional assessment of the Purple Tomato to FDA under the voluntary Biotechnology Notification Consultation program, which was received as BNF number 178. As of this writing, FDA has not yet published a completed consultation for Norfolk Plant Sciences purple tomato.
Conclusion
This regulatory review is an important milestone for regulation of genetically engineered plants in the United States. It is the first public test of the SECURE rules RSR process since its implementation more than a year ago, when it became one of the most scientifically progressive such review processes in the world, at least on paper. The deregulation of Norfolk Plant Sciences purple tomatoes shows that USDA-APHIS is embracing its new product-focused regulations. Although the review took more than a yearsignificantly longer than the 180 days promised by APHIS for Step 1the process will likely become more efficient as the agency and developers become more familiar and comfortable with the new system. It will be interesting to see how the exemption and review processes grow and possibly become more streamlined with additional use.
Read more from the original source:
Purple Tomato is first genetically engineered plant to be deregulated through USDA's new regulatory status review process - Lexology
- Principles of Genetic Engineering - PMC - National Center for ... - March 28th, 2024
- Historic Overview of Genetic Engineering Technologies for Human Gene ... - March 28th, 2024
- 20.3: Genetic Engineering - Biology LibreTexts - December 10th, 2023
- Genetically modified organism - Wikipedia - November 16th, 2023
- Genetic engineering - DNA Modification, Cloning, Gene Splicing - November 16th, 2023
- 18 Human Genetic Engineering - Clemson University - April 7th, 2023
- Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering - Benefits and Risks - April 7th, 2023
- Genetic Engineering - Meaning, Applications, Advantages and Challenges ... - March 12th, 2023
- Genetic Engineering Principles of Biology - December 27th, 2022
- Engineering the Perfect Baby | MIT Technology Review - December 27th, 2022
- What is CRISPR? | Live Science - November 24th, 2022
- To modify or not to modify? Genetic Modification and Gene Editing - A divergence by the UK - Lexology - October 13th, 2022
- DNA and the impossibility of research in isolation - Morning Star Online - October 13th, 2022
- Genome editing technologies: final conclusions of the re-examination of Article 13 of the Oviedo Convention - Council of Europe - October 13th, 2022
- Approval, Commercialization Highlighted at Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - October 13th, 2022
- Dissatisfaction and New Articulations - Discovery Institute - October 13th, 2022
- In 'The Cultivar Series,' Uli Westphal Gets to the Root of Crop Diversity and Agricultural Modification - Colossal - October 13th, 2022
- Genomic Research Aids in the Effort to Understand How Best to Treat Deadly Infections Caused by a Fungus - UMass News and Media Relations - October 13th, 2022
- Synthetic Biology Market is Expected to Report a CAGR of ~21% from 2021 to 2029: Industry Size, Growth & Forecast at Douglas Insights - Yahoo... - October 13th, 2022
- Farmers, consumers will embrace GMOs if they understand them - The Standard - October 13th, 2022
- Emily Whitten: The limits of science and human intelligence - WORLD News Group - October 13th, 2022
- Behind this Nobel prize is a very human story: theres a bit of Neanderthal in all of us - The Guardian - October 13th, 2022
- Earth materials in technology The National - The National - October 13th, 2022
- Gene therapy brings hope to people with sickle cell, HIV - Monitor - October 13th, 2022
- Eligo Bioscience Receives FDA Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) and Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Designation for EB003 for the Prevention of Hemolytic... - October 13th, 2022
- Skin Grafting, Cryopreservation, and Diseases: A Review Article - Cureus - October 13th, 2022
- Cultured meat could help solve the climate crisis. Heres what it will take to move it from the lab to the dinner table - Fortune - October 13th, 2022
- Ignore scary messages: We've never had it so good & that's not manure - West Side Index & Gustine Press-Standard - October 13th, 2022
- Global Phosphoramidite Market Report 2022: Increasing Synthetic Nucleotide Applications in Therapeutics Drives Growth - ResearchAndMarkets.com -... - October 13th, 2022
- Enzymes Market worth $16.9 billion by 2027 - Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets - Yahoo Finance - October 4th, 2022
- Experts Sound Alarm Over 'Growing Threat' of Genetically Engineered Trees - Common Dreams - October 4th, 2022
- Scientists are manipulating the DNA of mosquitoes to fight the spread of malaria - Euronews - October 4th, 2022
- Smile Coffee Werks upgraded its coffee beans to Fair Trade and USDA Organic - Vending Market Watch - October 4th, 2022
- COVID mRNA Jabs and Testing Kicked Off This Industry of Drug Development: Here's What You Need to Know - The Epoch Times - October 4th, 2022
- 22nd Century Group (Nasdaq: XXII) Expands VLN Distributor Network with the Addition of Specialty Distrib - Benzinga - October 4th, 2022
- Researchers are seeking to develop spuds that resist harmful nematodes - FreshPlaza.com - October 4th, 2022
- Synthetic biology has the power to cure and kill. How will we use it? - Big Think - September 25th, 2022
- SPECIAL REPORT: Bioengineered food labeling: 'They kind of shot in the middle and missed every constituency' - FoodNavigator-USA.com - September 25th, 2022
- Yeast-Fermented Chemo: Now We Can Brew Anything - Medscape - September 25th, 2022
- September 23, 2022: The Integrity of Marius Mason WFHB - WFHB News - September 25th, 2022
- 2 Risky Cathie Wood Growth Stocks to Buy and Hold for 5 Years - The Motley Fool - September 25th, 2022
- Bananas threatened by devastating fungus given temporary resistance - New Scientist - September 25th, 2022
- 'What Hath God Wrought' - Today, Luddites Are Concerned About Weedkillers Like They Once Were The Telegraph - Science 2.0 - September 25th, 2022
- Children should be educated about oral health and hygiene - Star of Mysore - September 25th, 2022
- Id rather eat an actual burger: why plant-based meats sizzle fizzled in the US - The Guardian - September 25th, 2022
- Health Tech startups are booming. These 11 VC investors are behind some of the hottest deals - Fortune - September 25th, 2022
- Last Chance This Fall to Tell the NOSB To Uphold Organic Integrity - Beyond Pesticides - September 25th, 2022
- Cambodian PM begins official visit to Cuba - Khmer Times - September 25th, 2022
- Researchers develop method to prevent spread of melanoma to brain - Xinhua - September 25th, 2022
- I'm allergic to the cat, what can I do? - Surinenglish.com - September 25th, 2022
- Researchers Propose a New Way of Regulating Engineered Crops - Modern Farmer - September 16th, 2022
- Genetically Modified Feed Market to Hit $135 billion by 2030, says Global Market Insights Inc. - Yahoo Finance - September 16th, 2022
- Africa, GMOs and Western Interests - DW (English) - September 16th, 2022
- The science behind the oil supply breakdown in 'Last Light' - Syfy - September 16th, 2022
- Inside the controversial plan to bring extinct animals back from the dead - The Independent - September 16th, 2022
- Star Trek Actor Says Their Trek Hero Is Just Like Their Marvel Character - Giant Freakin Robot - September 16th, 2022
- Scientists closer to making blood stem cells in the lab - Cosmos - September 16th, 2022
- Oncolytic Cancer Therapies Market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 33% by 2032 | DelveInsight - Digital Journal - September 16th, 2022
- Don't call it waste - it can be turned into hydrogen if you handle it right - Innovation Origins - September 16th, 2022
- Can gene editing ease the cost of living crisis? - The Grocer - September 8th, 2022
- Gene editing could revive the American chestnut tree and help fight climate change but familiar anti-biotechonology activist critics will have none... - September 8th, 2022
- Colossal to de-extinct the Tasmanian tiger. Is it a safe thing to do? - Cape Cod Times - September 8th, 2022
- The Future of Nanotech, the World's Tiniest Industry - Entrepreneur - September 8th, 2022
- Viewpoint: The 'natural food' sham 'Effective communication on the ethics of science may be hindered by appeals to naturalness' - Genetic Literacy... - September 8th, 2022
- Toray says it has developed the worlds first 100% bio-based adipic acid - Biofuels Digest - September 8th, 2022
- Chinese scientists claim to have engineered the world's first mouse with fully reprogrammed genes - Interesting Engineering - August 30th, 2022
- Century Therapeutics Receives Study May Proceed Notification from FDA for CNTY-101, the First Allogeneic Cell Therapy Product Candidate Engineered to... - August 30th, 2022
- Living Carbon: The startup setting down roots from 9 to 5 | Greenbiz - GreenBiz - August 30th, 2022
- Novavax Nuvaxovid COVID-19 Vaccine Granted Expanded Conditional Marketing Authorization in the United Kingdom for Use in Adolescents Aged 12 Through... - August 30th, 2022
- Genetics in fiction - Wikipedia - August 14th, 2022
- Weeds superpower could help feed the planet - Freethink - August 14th, 2022
- POSEIDA THERAPEUTICS, INC. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. (form 10-Q) - Marketscreener.com - August 14th, 2022
- Novartis Confirms Deaths of Two Patients Treated with Gene Therapy Zolgensma - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - August 14th, 2022
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lessons from 1984 | Letters To Editor | carolinacoastonline.com - Carolinacoastonline - August 14th, 2022
- How Arkeon Biotechnologies is turning CO2 into food: 'Excuse my language, but this is next-level cool' - FoodNavigator.com - August 14th, 2022
- Synlogic Announces Synthetic Biotic for Gout Developed in Partnership with Ginkgo Bioworks - PR Newswire - August 14th, 2022
- THE SAD STORY OF THE REJECTION OF SCIENCE - Sp Supplements - DAWN.COM - DAWN.com - August 14th, 2022
- Global Genome Editing Technologies market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 15.96% by 2032: Visiongain Reports Ltd - Yahoo Finance - August 5th, 2022
- I Got Critiqued by YouTuber Gutsick Gibbon - Discovery Institute - August 5th, 2022
- CRISPR Technology in the Agricultural Industry: Patent and Regulatory Updates - JD Supra - August 5th, 2022