Category Archives: Alaska Stem Cells

Enrolling in Cryo-Cell's Cord Blood and Cord TissueStem Cell Service is easy!

Alternative ways to Enroll

1Fee schedule subject to change without notice. If a client has received a kit anddiscontinues services prior to collection, a $150 non-refundable discontinuation fee applies.Add $50 for medical courier service from Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Subtract $50 for medical courier service from Tampa Bay, Florida area. Applies to 1-year plan only. After the first year, an annual storage fee will apply. If in-house financing is provided; first payment will be billed upon enrollment.

In order to preserve more types and quantity of umbilical cord stem cells and to maximize possible future health options, Cryo-Cells umbilical cord tissue service provides expectant families with the opportunity to cryogenically store their newborns umbilical cord tissue cells contained within substantially intact cord tissue. Should umbilical cord tissue cells be considered for potential utilization in a future therapeutic application, further laboratory processing may be necessary. Regarding umbilical cord tissue, all private blood banks activities for New York State residents are limited to collection, processing, and long-term storage of umbilical cord tissue stem cells. The possession of a New York State license for such collection, processing and long-term storage does not indicate approval or endorsement of possible future uses or future suitability of these cells.

Link:
Enrollment in the Cord Blood and Cord Tissue Stem Cell ...

High quality essays written by experts on stem cell research are presented. Essays discuss the uses and potential uses of embryonic stem cells and adult stem cells, as well as the controversies related to embryonic stem cell research. Key words and definitions are also provided.

If stem cells (whether embryonic or adult) are introduced into a patient's heart after a heart attack, they will migrate to the site of the damage, proliferate, and differentiate into new... READ MORE

In November 1998, two research teams led by James A. Thomson of the University of Wisconsin and John D. Gearhart of Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine independently... READ MORE

In July 2006, the U.S. Senate passed the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005, a bill that relaxed restrictions on government funding for stem cell research. The bill would allow... READ MORE

Argues that if stem cell interventions materialize along the lines described by their more avid proponents, it might upend our current ethical...READ MORE

Focuses on the controversial breakthrough in the field of human stem cell research. Details on the effective treatment for debilitating diseases and...READ MORE

Discusses the moral issues arising from stem cell research in the United States. Significance of the debate on embryo-destroying stem-cell research...READ MORE

Defines terms used in stem cell research and embryonic stem cell research.READ MORE

Presents information on stem cells research.READ MORE

The article discusses the debate about stem cell research.READ MORE

Read the original:
Find Articles and News on Human Stem Cell Research Pros ...

The issue of stem cell research, particularly embryonic stem cell research, became a high-profile political issue in the U.S. during the first year of President George W. Bush's term in office (2001). On August 9, 2001, Bush enacted a ban on federal spending for the purpose of deriving new embryonic stem cells from fertilized embryos. He argued that performing research on embryos is destroying human life, and should therefore be avoided. Both the 109th and 110th Congresses passed bills overturning the ban, but both were vetoed by Bush. During the 109th Congress, both houses also passed and Bush signed a bill banning the creation of human fetuses with the sole purpose of destroying them and harvesting their body parts. The Senate also passed a bill encouraging research into the creation of stem cell lines without destroying human embryos.

While both Democrats and Republicans have advocated for expanded federal funding for stem cell research, the debate over embryonic stem cells tends to be more polarized. Democrats are generally supportive of expanding embryonic research, while Republicans tend to favor expanding only other types of stem cell research that do not involve the harming of human embryos. [1]

Opponents of federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, including the Heritage Foundation, have argued that [more here].

Legislation governing stem cells in the 110th Congress (2007-2008) generally fell into two categories: bills seeking to expand the funding of embryonic stem cell research and bills seeking to expand stem cell research without using human embryonic stem cells.

The principle vehicle for expanding the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research in 2007 was the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 (H.R.3).

On January 11, 2007, the Democratic-controlled House passed the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007 (H.R.3), sponsored by Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), lifting the restriction on new federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research implemented by President Bush in 2001. Under this bill, the Secretary of Health and Human Services would be directed to conduct and support research that utilizes human embryonic stem cells. [2]

Under the bill, the cells eligible for use would be required to come from excess human embryos, smaller than the head of a pin, donated from in-vitro fertilization clinics. The cells would have had to have been created for the purpose of fertility treatment. Once a woman was successfully fertilized, the extra cells could be donated for research. In particular, the bill required that prior to the consideration of donating the embryo and through consultation with individuals seeking fertility treatment, it must have been determined that the embryos would never be implanted in a woman and would otherwise be discarded.[3]

To avoid cell farming and other efforts to profit from providing stem cells, the bill would require that the individuals seeking fertility treatment donate the embryos with written informed consent and without receiving any financial or other inducements to make the donation.[4]

The final vote was 253-174, thirty-seven votes short of a veto-proof majority. As expected, President Bush promised to veto the bill if it reached his desk. The White House issued a statement saying, "The administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 3, which would use federal taxpayer dollars to support and encourage the destruction of human life for research...If H.R. 3 were presented to the president, he would veto the bill."[5]

Read more from the original source:
U.S. federal stem cell legislation - SourceWatch

Back to lesson plans archive September 10, 2004

By Lisa Prososki, a former middle and high school teacher

Biology, General Science, Ethics

Two to three 50-minute class periods plus additional time for presentations and extension activities

Students will:

Stem cells are universal cells that have the ability to develop into specialized types of tissues that can then be used throughout the body to treat diseases or injuries. Stem Cell Research is a topic embroiled in much controversy. Scientists are hopeful that one day stem cells will be used to grow new organs such as kidneys or spinal cords as well as different types of tissues such as nerves, muscles, and blood vessels. The controversy sparked by the use of stem cells and research in this area comes from the fact that many people support the use of embryonic stem cells. These cells are taken from embryos that are just days old. As a result of this, the embryo, which is a developing human life, is destroyed. Many people feel it is immoral and unethical to destroy embryos for the sake of science. To further the debate, while these cells are easily cultured, replicate quickly, and have a relatively long life, embryonic stem cells have not yet been successfully used to provide any kind of therapy for humans and pose risks such as tumor growth and rejection by the body.

On the other side of the issue is the use of adult stem cells for research. Adult stem cells are available from a variety of sources including blood from the umbilical cord, the placenta, bone marrow, and even human fat. However, they are relatively hard to find and extract from some of these sources and do not always thrive well when cultured. In addition, they may have some limitations in the type of tissues they are able to form. For many years, adult stem cells have been used to provide a number of different therapies to people with a relatively high rate of success. Recent research has shown that adult stem cells taken from one area of the body are able to regenerate and form tissues of a different kind. In addition to the proven therapies and research, the use of adult stem cells from a patients own body decreases the risk of rejection because the cells are not seen as foreign invaders.

All in all, many scientists believe that the use of adult stem cells should be the primary focus of stem cell research based on past success, lower chances of patient rejection, and the idea that adult stem cell research does not spark the moral, ethical, and political debate seen so frequently when the use of embryonic stem cells is considered.

Imagine you live in a time and place where people no longer suffer from diseases like Parkinsons, diabetes, heart disease, cancer, organ failure, or Alzheimers. Imagine that spinal cords can be replaced and that most forms of paralysis have been eliminated. Imagine that nerves, muscles, and even badly burned skin can be regenerated and replaced. Now imagine that the source of this technology comes from something that cant be seen with the human eye. While it might sound like space-age technology that we see in science fiction books and movies, imagine that it could actually be a reality.

Follow this link:
Stem Cell Research: The Debate Over Embryonic and Adult ...

In the beginning, one cell becomes two, and two become four. Being fruitful, they multiply into a ball of many cells, a shimmering sphere of human potential. Scientists have long dreamed of plucking those naive cells from a young human embryo and coaxing them to perform, in sterile isolation, the everyday miracle they perform in wombs: transforming into all the 200 or so kinds of cells that constitute a human body. Liver cells. Brain cells. Skin, bone, and nerve.

The dream is to launch a medical revolution in which ailing organs and tissues might be repairednot with crude mechanical devices like insulin pumps and titanium joints but with living, homegrown replacements. It would be the dawn of a new era of regenerative medicine, one of the holy grails of modern biology.

Revolutions, alas, are almost always messy. So when James Thomson, a soft-spoken scientist at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, reported in November 1998 that he had succeeded in removing cells from spare embryos at fertility clinics and establishing the world's first human embryonic stem cell line, he and other scientists got a lot more than they bargained for. It was the kind of discovery that under most circumstances would have blossomed into a major federal research enterprise. Instead the discovery was quickly engulfed in the turbulent waters of religion and politics. In church pews, congressional hearing rooms, and finally the Oval Office, people wanted to know: Where were the needed embryos going to come from, and how many would have to be destroyed to treat the millions of patients who might be helped? Before long, countries around the world were embroiled in the debate.

Most alarmed have been people who see embryos as fully vested, vulnerable members of society, and who decry the harvesting of cells from embryos as akin to cannibalism. They warn of a brave new world of "embryo farms" and "cloning mills" for the cultivation of human spare parts. And they argue that scientists can achieve the same results using adult stem cells immature cells found in bone marrow and other organs in adult human beings, as well as in umbilical cords normally discarded at birth.

Advocates counter that adult stem cells, useful as they may be for some diseases, have thus far proved incapable of producing the full range of cell types that embryonic stem cells can. They point out that fertility clinic freezers worldwide are bulging with thousands of unwanted embryos slated for disposal. Those embryos are each smaller than the period at the end of this sentence. They have no identifying features or hints of a nervous system. If parents agree to donate them, supporters say, it would be unethical not to do so in the quest to cure people of disease.

Few question the medical promise of embryonic stem cells. Consider the biggest United States killer of all: heart disease. Embryonic stem cells can be trained to grow into heart muscle cells that, even in a laboratory dish, clump together and pulse in spooky unison. And when those heart cells have been injected into mice and pigs with heart disease, they've filled in for injured or dead cells and sped recovery. Similar studies have suggested stem cells' potential for conditions such as diabetes and spinal cord injury.

Critics point to worrisome animal research showing that embryonic stem cells sometimes grow into tumors or morph into unwanted kinds of tissuespossibly forming, for example, dangerous bits of bone in those hearts they are supposedly repairing. But supporters respond that such problems are rare and a lot has recently been learned about how to prevent them.

The arguments go back and forth, but policymakers and governments aren't waiting for answers. Some countries, such as Germany, worried about a slippery slope toward unethical human experimentation, have already prohibited some types of stem cell research. Others, like the U.S., have imposed severe limits on government funding but have left the private sector to do what it wants. Still others, such as the U.K., China, Korea, and Singapore, have set out to become the epicenters of stem cell research, providing money as well as ethical oversight to encourage the field within carefully drawn bounds.

In such varied political climates, scientists around the globe are racing to see which techniques will produce treatments soonest. Their approaches vary, but on one point, all seem to agree: How humanity handles its control over the mysteries of embryo development will say a lot about who we are and what we're becoming.

For more than halfof his seven years, Cedric Seldon has been fighting leukemia. Now having run out of options, he is about to become a biomedical pioneerone of about 600 Americans last year to be treated with an umbilical cord blood transplant.

View post:
Stem Cell Research Article, Embryonic Cells Information ...

Today, a man lies dying of liver failure in a hospital. There is little expectation that he will be one of the lucky few to receive a transplant before he becomes too ill to save. Even if he did receive a transplant, he will be burdened with taking multiple anti-rejection drugs for the rest of his life, which in and of themselves would significantly compromise his health.

Tomorrow, scientists develop a method to build this man a new liver, one that would be a perfect match for him, requiring no anti-rejection drugs whatsoever. There is a catch. To perfect such a solution would require the destruction of other lives. Would Judaism sanction such a solution?

Jewish law clearly forbids the taking of one life to save another. The Talmud forbids saving one's life at the expense of another by asking how one knows that his life is more valuable than his neighbor's. Perhaps your neighbor's life is more valuable.

When The Fetus Is A Threat To Life

But, what if the life that would need to be sacrificed was that of a fetus? May we permit abortion to save the life of an already born person? The Mishna clearly states that if the life of a woman in labor is threatened by her fetus, the fetus should be aborted. But once a portion of the baby has emerged, we may not abort the fetus, because "one may not set aside one person's life for the sake of another."

The principle behind this ruling is that one may kill someone who is unjustly pursuing a third party to kill him. Since the fetus, who is not yet considered a "complete" person, is "pursuing" the mother in a way that will inevitably result in her death, we may kill it first. But, once it has even partially emerged, it is considered a full-fledged person. Now we are faced with a dilemma, states Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, one of the most respected rabbis of the 20th century: who is pursuing whom?

When Pursuing Each Other

Imagine that you are transported back in time to Weehawken, New Jersey, on July 11, 1804. As you step out of the time machine you see Aaron Burr, pulling out a revolver to shoot Alexander Hamilton, former U.S. Treasury Secretary. Simultaneously, you see Hamilton also drawing his revolver to kill Burr! What should you do? Kill Burr? Kill Hamilton? Jewish law would rule that you may kill neither, because they are pursuing each other and you do not know which one, if either, is an innocent party.

In our case of the baby struggling to be born at the expense of the mother and the mother struggling to survive at the expense of the fetus, are not the baby and the mother each "pursuing" the other? In such a case, the general rule is that we may not choose either, since each is a complete and autonomous person, and each is both the pursuer and the pursued. Luckily for us, these scenarios are very rare occurrences in our day thanks to Caesarian sections.

But, since the rationale for abortion in Jewish law is based on the fetus being a pursuer of the mother, a life-threatening situation for another adult would not justify our killing a fetus, since the fetus does not threaten the life of anyone except the mother. Therefore, we cannot allow abortion, even to save the life of our patient with liver failure.

More here:
Is Stem Cell Research Ethical? Ethical issues stem cell ...

Awards | Events | Policy | People | Facilities | Funding | Business | Trend watch | Coming up

Nobel prizes Three neuroscientists share this years Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their insights into the neural basis of spatial navigation. John OKeefe was honoured for his discovery of place cells, which are activated when a rat passes particular spots; May-Britt Moser and Edvard Moser discovered grid cells, which help to create a coordinate system in the brain. The physics prize was awarded to Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura for their invention of blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs), which enabled todays bright, energy-efficient white LEDs. See pages 152, 153 and 154 for more. Nature went to press before the chemistry prize was awarded, but full details will be available at go.nature.com/ygtzbs.

Corey Accardo/NOAA

Walruses seek shelter on land A lack of sea ice has driven more than 35,000Pacific walruses (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) onto land at Point Lay, Alaska, the US Geological Survey said on 1 October. The animals normally spend summers resting on ice floes, occasionally diving to the ocean floor to feed on clams, snails and worms. But with ice levels low in the Chukchi Sea this summer, walruses have come ashore in record numbers (pictured). The animals are easily spooked, so scientists say that the risk of fatal stampedes is high. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is considering whether to protect the Pacific walrus under the Endangered Species Act owing to harm from hunting and sea-ice loss; a decision is expected in 2017. See page 140 for more.

Ebola exported A health worker in Spain has tested positive for Ebola, the countrys health minister said on 6 October. The worker, the first person thought to have contracted the virus outside Africa, had treated a missionary who had returned to Spain from Sierra Leone. On 30 September, health officials confirmed the first case of Ebola diagnosed in the United States a man who arrived in Dallas, Texas, from Liberia on 20 September. On 6October, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that the man may have exposed up to 48people to the virus. See page139 for more.

Animal care A UK government report released on 2October cleared Imperial College London of nearly all allegations of animal cruelty raised by an animal-rights group in 2013. But the Home Office investigation noted persistent shortcomings in the management of animal care, and five instances of non-compliance since addressed by the university that were symptomatic of a widespread poor culture of care in the universitys animal-research laboratories. See go.nature.com/wyc2vz for more.

Telescope turns on A 12-metre radio telescope on Kitt Peak in Arizona has begun observations, scientists at the University of Arizona in Tucson said on 2 October. The telescope is one of three prototypes originally made for the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, and will be used to study phenomena such as molecules in interstellar space and supermassive black holes. The university lost a bid for another of the prototype dishes in 2011; that antenna is destined for Greenland (seepage 147).

Stem-cell saga ends Italys health ministry will not support a trial of a controversial stem-cell therapy that it had promised last yearmarking the end of a two-year battle between the therapys inventor and Italian scientists who had declared the treatment ineffective and possibly dangerous. Health minister Beatrice Lorenzin announced her final decision on 2October, on the basis of conclusions from an expert committee that was convened after a court ruled a previous committee had been illegally biased. See go.nature.com/zlryhz for more.

PNAS rules tighten The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) closed one of its avenues to publication on 1October. Editor-in-chief Inder Verma said that the journal will discontinue its pre-arranged editor process, whereby authors could submit manuscripts through a member of the academy. See go.nature.com/szpjio for more.

USIndia space pact The US and Indian space agencies signed an agreement on 30September to increase their collaborative efforts. A working group will coordinate observations between NASAs MAVEN mission and the Mars Orbiter Mission of the Indian Space Research Organisation which arrived at Mars on 21and 24September, respectively and explore cooperative efforts on future Mars missions. They will also jointly launch an Earth-observing satellite in 2020.

Read more from the original source:
Seven days: 39 October 2014

The soft hum of two motorcycles drifted down the Alaska Highway, entering the Arctic Circle. Green grass and soaring mountains surrounded the pale grey road. These men were a long way from Texas, but had just embarked on of the most memorable journey of their lifetime.

The familiar saying Practice what you preach comes to mind when thinking of Tyler, Texas physician, Dr. David Fletcher. With an office dedicated to helping patients live younger, Doc Fletcher follows his own advice. In July of 2011, he, along with long-time friend, Tim King, embarked on an adventure of which most souls could only dream. A motorcycle ride across the states, ending at the beautiful Arctic Circle.

The men had pointed their bikes north out of East Texas on the sixth of July, traveling a total of two weeks toward the Arctic Circle. The men would not see the tall green pines of East Texas again until their return on the fifth of August.

Docs passion for thrills started out at a young age while growing up in Waco. His father owned a Cushman dealership, quickly sparking the interest of the young boy in two-wheel locomotion.

When I was little, my daddy owned a Cushman dealership; I cut my teeth on those things when I was just a kid, Doc said with a reminiscing tone. I raced motocross for a number of years, then I quit when I was about 40. His love for pushing the limit didnt stop there; he then took up long-distance running.

About a year ago, I got to thinking, Doc said. At my age, it would be fun to try to go to the Arctic Circle and back.

They did just that. Doc and his long-time cowboy friend Tim King took off on a 10,000-mile trip, traveling up through Colorado, Yellowstone and then up through Canada, passing through a number of national parks and forests. The bikes roared on up British Columbia and then through the Yukon Territory. The sights the men witnessed were breathtaking, and at times, terrifying. The mens original plan was to camp out Gunsmoke cowboy style at night, but they quickly changed their minds.

We were going to camp out, but by the time we got to Colorado where it was cool enough to camp, it started raining. It rained for the next seven days solid, and by that time we had seen so many darn bears, and there were all kinds of reports in the paper about these bears eating people. We decided that if our wives would keep on paying the visa bill, wed try to find a place to stay that was on the inside, Doc laughingly said.

Bears wouldnt be the only things the men needed to keep a watchful eye for. During their first homeward bound day of traveling, Docs BMW motorcycle skidded off a cliff. He and the bike went end over end down toward the Chilkoot River 500 feet below.

See the original post:
Alaska Trip - Texas Stem Cell

Alaska Patient Consults Dr.Lox on Stem Cell Therapy

Tampa, Saint Petersburg and Clearwater, FL

Dr. Dennis Lox, a sports and regenerative specialist in the Tampa Bay, Florida area, has seen and been consulted by patients in many foreign countries. But, when a patient in Alaska consulted him for stem cell therapy treatment it represented the furthest state in the United States to consult him. He has seen many patients from other states but Alaska is now the most distant to consult Dr.Lox. It is an honor and privilege to care for patients, yet having patients travel great distances and inconveniences to be under the care of Dr. Lox is truly an honor he respects. His staff makes every effort to accommodate their needs and make the journey and care as pleasant as possible.

Dr. Dennis Loxserves patients in the greater Tampa Bay area, including, Clearwater, St. Petersburg, Tampa, New Port Richey, Sarasota, Orlando and Spring Hill. He has been pleased to accommodate the needs of patients throughout Florida, the United States, the Western Hemisphere, and Europe, as well. Located in the 33765 area, our office can be reached at (727) 462-5582.

View original post here:
Alaska Patient Consults Dr.Lox on Stem Cell Therapy - Dr Lox

Looking for help with Akinetic Mutism in Fairbanks? Listed below are doctors and medical centers in and near Fairbanks Alaska.

If you are not looking for help with Akinetic Mutism, check out the popular Akinetic Mutism info on the right navigation area of the page. On the Akinetic Mutism pages we include website links so you can check out Akinetic Mutism online.

Are you searching for information about Akinetic Mutism? Have you or someone you know been diagnosed with Akinetic Mutism? Have you considered Stem Cell treatments for Akinetic Mutism? Welcome to the stem cell center service for the state of KY! Many diseases and illnesses don't have to be as treacherous as once thought. There are potential cures and treatments available that are quite effective and very hopeful for Akinetic Mutism If you are ready to consider adult stem cell treatment and adult stem cell therapy as an alternative for your medical disorder Akinetic Mutism, then you are at the right place. Here at alternativetreatmentsfor.com we specialize in providing effective stem cells for Akinetic Mutism in or near Fairbanks, KY 99707. For immediate, free, and confidential assistance, download or .pdf file and call our helpline NOW!

Are you searching for a stem cell? Have you or someone you know been diagnosed with Akinetic Mutism ? Welcome to the stem cell center service for the state of Alaska! Many diseases and illnesses are more treatable than most people once thought. There are many potential cures - stem cells and treatments available that have proven to be quite effective and very hopeful for Akinetic Mutism

If you are open to the idea of adult stem cell treatment and adult stem cell therapy as an alternative method of treatment for your medical disorder Akinetic Mutism, then you have found the right place. Here at naturalcurefor.com we specialize in helping people heal by providing effective and stem cells for Akinetic Mutism in or near Fairbanks, Alaska 99707. For immediate, free, and confidential assistance, download our .pdf file and call our helpline NOW!

We have successfully helped many people in Alaska. We can help you attain real, effective, stem cells and alternative treatments for Akinetic Mutism. Health improvements after our natural method of treatments have been used have shown terrific results in a very high percentage of cases. Every human being deserves to have good health and that is our desire to sincerely provide a network of resources available to help you or your loved one achieve better health. Don't let another day or week go by. Don't think that the pain or the Akinetic Mutism you or a loved one have endured cannot be ended or put on a better more natural healing path to good health. Don't give up hope. We can help you recover, but you have to take the first step by contacting us now!

Fairbanks, Alaska - Stem cell for Akinetic Mutism - We Can Provide Some Tremendous Hope if You Are Willing to Consider Adult Stem Cell Therapy and Treatments as Your Path Back To Good Health

Treating Akinetic Mutism in a traditional medical manner is sometimes a long and grueling process that can offer less hope than you deserve. Additionally, many traditional medical treatments are riddled with drugs and medications that can sometimes cause even more harm to other parts of the body. Further risks of medication mixups, allergies, destruction of the immune system and the constant level of additional medical treatments that may be required, can sometimes weigh heavily on a patient and their chances of regaining a healthful way of life. Recovery can become difficult or almost impossible in some cases.

We offer an alternative treatment or a more stem cell process that centers around the idea of using your own adult stem cells as the basis of this natural treatment. In some areas of the country, traditional medicine and medical practices may not have acknowledged the benefits that stem cell treatments can bring to the healing process. Stem cell treatments may not be a standard course of medical treatment quite yet, but that may be a result of other political and/or profit motives. But rest assured that is all changing and changing quite rapidly as more and more success and overwhelming evidence indicates that adult stem cell therapy is a very successful and viable treatment process for Akinetic Mutism.

Stem cell treatment is extremely effective and very safe. It is also very natural, ethical and a very effective way in assisting the body to heal naturally and wholesomely. It embodies the very idea of "healing" rather than simply medicating a symptom. The main idea of how adult stem cell treatments work are as follows...

Read more:
Stem cell therapy for Akinetic Mutism in Fairbanks Alaska