The mistake Nobel Prize prognosticators yours truly included make is to look through the greatest hits of biochemistry, biology, and medicine (the areas STAT covers) nuclear hormone receptors! microRNAs! and figure (as last years prediction story did) one of those is due and deserving. The trouble is, as MITs Phillip Sharp, who shared the 1993 medicine Nobel, told me, There is just a lot of good science that will never get recognized.
So focusing on the greatest hits to forecast the science winners who will be announced next week is too simplistic. Theyre all contenders, but the smart money looks for other criteria. Like toggling between discoveries of what cells and molecules do and inventions of techniques that reveal what they do, or between disciplines, or (for medicine) between something that directly cures patients and something about the wonders of living cells.
By that criteria, it might be a techniques turn, since the last such winner in medicine was for turning adult cells into stem cells, in 2012. Could this be the year for optogenetics, which allows brain scientists to control genetically modified neurons with light? I dont think optogenetics has made a big enough impact outside of neuroscience yet, said cancer biologist Jason Sheltzer of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, who dabbles in Nobel predictions, but who knows.
advertisement
The last Nobel for DNA sequencing was way back in 1980, he pointed out, and since then we have seen the complete sequencing of the human genome, one of humanitys towering achievements. (Sheltzer correctly predicted 2018s medicine Nobel for immuno-oncology pioneer James Allison. The Human Genome Project could win it for the officials who led it, like Francis Collins of the National Institutes of Health and Eric Lander of the Broad Institute. Would Craig Venter, who led a competing private effort, make it to Stockholm, too? Let the betting commence!
Just to be clear, science Nobels arent chosen all that, well, scientifically. For medicine, a five-member Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine at Swedens Karolinska Institute sifts nominations and selects candidates. The 50-member Nobel Assembly votes, this year on Oct. 5. So you can get head-scratchers from, say, 20-18-12 or similarly split votes if, say, genetics fanciers split their votes among two contenders. (If you want to know if that happened, hang on until 2070: Nobel records are secret and sealed for 50 years.) For chemistry, chosen on Oct. 7 this year, the five-member Nobel Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences likewise sifts nominations and recommends finalists to the academy for a vote.
advertisement
Besides invention and discovery switching off in the medicine Nobel, there certainly seems to be periodicity in terms of disciplines taking turns, said David Pendlebury of data company Clarivate Analytics. He has made 54 correct Nobel predictions (usually in the wrong year, but in 29 cases within just two) since 2002 by analyzing how often a scientists key papers are cited by peers and awarded predictive prizes like the Lasker or Gairdner awards.
Neuroscience won the medicine Nobel in 2000, 2004, 2014, and 2017, immunology in 2008, 2011, and 2018, for instance. Infectious disease and cancer win every decade or two, and so are probably also-rans for 2020. Thats why STAT said last year that the 2018 medicine award for immuno-oncology made cancer an unlikely 2019 winner. Yet William Kaelin, Peter Ratcliffe, and Gregg Semenza won for discovering how cells sense and adapt to oxygen availability, through gene regulation, which is tangentially related to cancer. Go figure.
For the medicine prize, periodicity also applies to toggling between super-basic molecular biology and stuff that actually cures people (not year by year, but generally). Last years award for how cells sense changing oxygen levels was pretty abstruse and might shape this years choice.
Prizes with a more clinical focus have been 2003 (MRI), 2005 (H. pylori and ulcers), 2008 (HIV), 2015 (roundworm and malaria therapy), and 2018 (immuno-oncology), [so] maybe a clinical type of prize this year, [such as] hepatitis C treatment, brain stimulation for Parkinsons, cochlear implant, statins Pendlebury said. We wouldnt be surprised at a hep C win for Charles Rice of Rockefeller University and Ralf Bartenschlager of Heidelberg University (2016 Lasker winners) for the super-basic discoveries that led to drugs that cure the viral disease.
Like Pendlebury, Sheltzer believes in predictive prizes. I looked back at the last 20 years of Nobel Prizes in medicine/physiology, he said. Eighty-three percent of them had won at least one of three prizes before the Nobel: the Lasker, the Gairdner, or the Horwitz Prize. Of the five people who have recently won all three, only one works in a field so far ignored by the Nobel committees, he said: Yale School of Medicines Arthur Horwich, a pioneer of protein folding and chaperone proteins. In addition to the Gairdner in 2004, Horwitz in 2008, and Lasker in 2011, he received the $3 million Breakthrough Prize in 2019. So thats guess #1, Sheltzer said.
Unless Weve had a few [medicine] awards that you could classify as cell biology recently oxygen sensing in 2019, autophagy in 2016, even immune regulation is kinda cell biological, Sheltzer acknowledged. So I think a genetics award is more likely than one to Horwich, whose discoveries about how cells fold the proteins they synthesize are central to the understanding of life. STATs nickel says look no further than the 2015 Lasker Basic Medical Research Award: It honored Evelyn Witkin of Rutgers and Stephen Elledge of Harvard for discovering how DNA repairs itself after being damaged.
Might David Allis of Rockefeller and Michael Grunstein of UCLA finally get the call to Stockholm? They discovered one way genes are activated (through proteins called histones). Theyve shared a 2018 Lasker and a 2016 Gruber Prize in Genetics, and basically launched the hot field of epigenetics. I think a prize related to epigenetic control of transcription by DNA and histone modifications could be in order, Kaelin told STAT.
For physiology or medicine, Pendlebury likes Pamela Bjorkman of Caltech and Jack Strominger of Harvard for determining the structure and function of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins, a landmark discovery that has contributed to drug and vaccine development, as well as Yusuke Nakamura of the University of Tokyo for genome-wide association studies that led to personalized approaches to cancer treatment (personally, we doubt this is cancers year again), and Huda Zoghbi of Baylor College of Medicine for work on the origin of neurological disorders.
In chemistry, Pendlebury likes Moungi Bawendi of MIT, Christopher Murray of the University of Pennsylvania, and Taeghwan Hyeon of Seoul National University for synthesizing nanocrystals, a cool new way to deliver drugs, and Makoto Fujita of the University of Tokyo for discovering supramolecular chemistry, in which lab-made molecules self-assemble by emulating how nature makes them. That has some overlap with Frances Arnolds 2018 Nobel for chemistry, so were skeptical, but who knows?
Lets address the elephant in the Nobel anteroom, and the chatter that the revolutionary genome editing technique CRISPR will win for chemistry. (Its value in medicine is still TBD, but its stellar biochemistry.)
The discovery of the CRISPR-Cas9 system is certainly worthy of a Nobel Prize, Kaelin said. I suspect the challenge here will be to get the attribution right. Perhaps there could be a chemistry prize for the basic mechanism and a medicine prize for application to somatic gene editing in human cells.
By attribution, he means, who gets CRISPR credit? Only three people can share a Nobel. But CRISPR has more mothers and fathers than that. Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley, and her collaborator Emmanuelle Charpentier have won a slew of predictive prizes for their work turning a bacterial immune system into a DNA editor, but dark horse Virginijus iknys of Vilnius University shared the 2018 $1 million Kavli Prize in nanoscience for his CRISPR work. And Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute is more widely cited than the above three, Pendlebury said, a marker of what colleagues think.
CRISPR citations built up more to Feng Zheng et al. than to Doudna and Charpentier, but I dont think that matters as much as judgments about priority claim, Pendlebury said. There are more than three to credit and I do think that is problematic. Bad feelings are not something the Nobel Assembly wants to generate, I am sure.
CRISPR will win, said CSHLs Sheltzer. Its a question of when, not if. Zhang/Doudna/Charpentier/Horvath/Barrangou shared the Gairdner. Pick 2 or 3 of them?
Go here to see the original:
Dust off the crystal ball: It's time for STAT's 2020 Nobel Prize predictions - STAT
- Stem Cell Therapy for Treatment of Ocular Disorders - Hindawi - December 27th, 2022
- Researchers find out why some stress is good for you - November 6th, 2022
- Shinya Yamanaka - Wikipedia - October 29th, 2022
- Implanting a Patient's Own Reprogrammed Stem Cells Shows Early Positive ... - October 29th, 2022
- World's first stem cell treatment for spina bifida delivered during fetal surgery - UC Davis Health - October 13th, 2022
- JDRF Announces the Appointment of Qizhi Tang, Ph.D., as Co-Director of The JDRF Center of Excellence in Northern California - PR Newswire - October 13th, 2022
- California court creates regulatory uncertainty over the FDA regulation of stem cell therapies - BioEdge - October 4th, 2022
- Scientists have created a mechanical womb that can grow life in the lab - Inverse - October 4th, 2022
- ISCT: California stem cell ruling is flawed and has inserted regulatory uncertainty into the CGT market - BioPharma-Reporter.com - September 16th, 2022
- Scientists Use Stem Cells to Create Synthetic Mouse Embryos - September 16th, 2022
- UK Equine Research Hall of Fame Inductees Announced - Equi Management - September 16th, 2022
- Cultured meat startup Prolific Machines unveils its Henry Ford approach to cell growth - TechCrunch - September 16th, 2022
- New Stem Cell Therapy Protects Brain Against the Neurological Disorder - Nature World News - September 8th, 2022
- Scientists Are Working on New and Improved Hair Loss Treatments - Gizmodo - September 8th, 2022
- What happens to the brain on prescription steroids? - Medical News Today - September 8th, 2022
- How this scientist uses Legos to explain the power of stem cells - August 30th, 2022
- CIRM Bridges intern researches stem cells to grow kidneys - August 30th, 2022
- Alzheimer's: Could controlling the brain's own clean-up crew help? - Medical News Today - August 22nd, 2022
- Trial to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Novel Cell Therapy to Standard of Care in Patients With Rare Blood Cancers - Curetoday.com - August 5th, 2022
- Medpoint Global was awarded the Best Revolutionary Hair Transplant Center of the Year and continues to follow developments in its field and offer more... - August 5th, 2022
- Cell Culture Media Market Worth $14.64 Billion by 2029 - Exclusive Report by Meticulous Research - GlobeNewswire - August 5th, 2022
- Haifan Lin takes on new role as President of the ISSCR - EurekAlert - July 3rd, 2022
- UCI-led team discovers signaling molecule that potently stimulates hair growth - UCI News - July 3rd, 2022
- Calidi Biotherapeutics Announces Appointment of W.K. Alfred Yung, M.D., to its Medical Advisory Board - Business Wire - July 3rd, 2022
- Organoids reveal similarities between myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Rett syndrome - EurekAlert - July 3rd, 2022
- Our View: Roe reversal hard hit to science - The Durango Herald - July 3rd, 2022
- Connection Map Reveals Changes in the Injured Brain - Technology Networks - June 22nd, 2022
- Scientists Used CRISPR to Trace Every Human Gene to Its Function - Singularity Hub - June 22nd, 2022
- Maike Sander named to lead the Max Delbrck Center - EurekAlert - June 22nd, 2022
- CRISPR-Cas12a Editing Rates Improve with Better Directions to the Nucleus - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News - June 22nd, 2022
- UB-led study presents critical step forward in understanding Parkinson's disease and how to treat it - University at Buffalo - June 13th, 2022
- Stem Cells: A Case for the Use of Human Embryos in Scientific Research - June 4th, 2022
- Top Beverly Hills Plastic Surgeon, Dr. John Anastasatos, Explores Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer (CAL) with Breast Augmentation in New Publication -... - June 4th, 2022
- Regenerative Medicine Market To Grow At A CAGR Of 11.27% By 2027, Due To Advancements In Cell Biology, Genomics Research, And Gene-Editing Technology... - June 4th, 2022
- Google Reverses Ban on Ads for All Stem Cell Therapies, Will Allow FDA-Approved Ones - Gizmodo Australia - May 15th, 2022
- Head-To-Head Survey: Jasper Therapeutics (NASDAQ:JSPR) & CytRx (OTCMKTS:CYTR) - Defense World - May 15th, 2022
- Primary Cell Culture Market Mechanical Separation Segment Is Expected To Witness A Lucrative CAGR Of 11.7% Till 2028, Owing To Advancements In... - May 15th, 2022
- Ray Therapeutics Receives $4M in Funding From the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) - BioSpace - May 2nd, 2022
- Predicting the Future of Food - Bon Appetit - May 2nd, 2022
- FDA Grants Direct Biologics Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) Designation for the use of ExoFlo in COVID-19 Related ARDS USA - English -... - April 19th, 2022
- Chronic Diseases Is Expected To Have Positive Impact On Stem Cell Characterization Kits Market Demand Bloomingprairieonline - Bloomingprairieonline - April 19th, 2022
- Cleveland Cord Blood Center and Deverra Therapeutics Announce Agreement - Yahoo Finance - April 6th, 2022
- A model that mimics malformation associated with severe epilepsy paves way to novel therapies - EurekAlert - March 25th, 2022
- Stem cell agency: Following the money - and its performance - Capitol Weekly - December 24th, 2021
- Epithelial Cell Culture Media Market to hit US$ 303040.33 thousand by 2028, at 11.4% CAGR: The Insight Partners - Digital Journal - December 24th, 2021
- What is Biohacking? Understanding the Silicon Valley Wellness Trend Youll Hear About in 2022 - SheKnows - December 24th, 2021
- Second Woman Spontaneously Clears HIV: 'We Think More Are Out - Medscape - November 22nd, 2021
- Business Partnership for Development and Commercialization of Medical Device Implant Utilizing MSC2 for the Regeneration of Esophageal Tissue in... - November 22nd, 2021
- Misinformation on stem cell treatments for COVID-19 linked to overhyped science, researchers argue - EurekAlert - October 16th, 2021
- Phase 2 Clinical Trial Data of NurOwn in Progressive MS Will Be Presented at the 37th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in... - October 16th, 2021
- StemExpress Partners with the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine to Provide COVID-19 Testing for the Cell and Gene Meeting on the Mesa - WSAW - October 5th, 2021
- BrainStorm to Present at the 2021 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa - WWNY - October 5th, 2021
- UC Davis and the School of Medicine set new records in research funding - UC Davis Health - August 31st, 2021
- FDA gives speedy review to Bayer's Parkinson's stem cell therapy - - pharmaphorum - July 21st, 2021
- Stem cell model reveals how COVID-19 can infect the brain - Study Finds - July 21st, 2021
- Introducing the 3D bioprinted neural tissues with the potential to 'cure' human paralysis - 3D Printing Industry - July 21st, 2021
- Insception Lifebank and Cells for Life Join the Generate Life Sciences Family to Create a Global Platform - Canada NewsWire - June 6th, 2021
- Innovative Regenerative Medicine Therapies Safety Comes First - FDA.gov - June 6th, 2021
- ViaCyte to Present Late-Breaking Data at the American Diabetes Association's 81st Scientific Sessions - PRNewswire - June 6th, 2021
- Viral vector unlikely to be cause of leukemia in gene therapy patient - Science Magazine - March 11th, 2021
- Astrocytes Derived from Patients with Bipolar Disorder Malfunction - UC San Diego Health - March 11th, 2021
- Peer Recognition | The UCSB Current - The UCSB Current - March 11th, 2021
- Stem cells on the ballot - Science Magazine - January 20th, 2021
- Controlling the immune system with 'invisible stem' cells - BioNews - January 20th, 2021
- How a UCSF team is giving Cronutt the sea lion a second chance with neuroscience - University of California - October 20th, 2020
- What Proposition 14 Tells Us About California - The New York Times - October 20th, 2020
- California Proposition 14: Funding medical research that uses stem cells - KTLA - October 20th, 2020
- Technology to natures rescue - The Hindu - October 20th, 2020
- What You Need to Know About Prop 14, The Stem Cell Research Bond (Transcript) - KQED - October 5th, 2020
- UC Davis Engineers Lead $36M Effort to Improve Recovery From Spinal Cord Injuries - UC Davis - October 5th, 2020
- Stem Cells Offer Hope of Treatment for COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) - HospiMedica - September 15th, 2020
- David Shavelle, MD, Named Medical Director of Adult Cardiology for the MemorialCare Heart & Vascular Institute at Long Beach Medical Center -... - September 15th, 2020
- Seeing the eye like never before | Newsroom - UW Medicine Newsroom - September 15th, 2020
- Why The FDA's Recent Approval Of New Vaccine Is A Gigantic Win In The War On Cancer - Innovation & Tech Today - September 7th, 2020
- Gore partners with San Diego company on cell delivery system with potential to treat Type 1 diabetes - delawarebusinessnow.com - August 12th, 2020
- Celularity announces the activation of first California Clinical Trial Site following CIRM Grant Award to Advance Treatments for COVID-19 - PRNewswire - August 12th, 2020
- Meet The 12 Next-Gen Food Techs Transforming The Future Of Protein - Green Queen Media - August 12th, 2020
- BeyondSpring Initiates Expanded Access Program with Plinabulin for Patients Suffering from CIN in the US - BioSpace - August 12th, 2020
- BCLI: Phase 3 ALS Data Expected by the End of November 2020 - Yahoo Finance - August 12th, 2020
- Impact of COVID 19 pandemic on Stem Cell Characterization and Analysis Tools Market Structure and Its Segmentation - 3rd Watch News - July 1st, 2020