Molecular evolution is the process of change in the sequence composition of cellular molecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins across generations. The field of molecular evolution uses principles of evolutionary biology and population genetics to explain patterns in these changes. Major topics in molecular evolution concern the rates and impacts of single nucleotide changes, neutral evolution vs. natural selection, origins of new genes, the genetic nature of complex traits, the genetic basis of speciation, evolution of development, and ways that evolutionary forces influence genomic and phenotypic changes.
The content and structure of a genome is the product of the molecular and population genetic forces which act upon that genome. Novel genetic variants will arise through mutation and will spread and be maintained in populations due to genetic drift or natural selection.
Mutations are permanent, transmissible changes to the genetic material (DNA or RNA) of a cell or virus. Mutations result from errors in DNA replication during cell division and by exposure to radiation, chemicals, and other environmental stressors, or viruses and transposable elements. Most mutations that occur are single nucleotide polymorphisms which modify single bases of the DNA sequence, resulting in point mutations. Other types of mutations modify larger segments of DNA and can cause duplications, insertions, deletions, inversions, and translocations.
Most organisms display a strong bias in the types of mutations that occur with strong influence in GC-content. Transitions (A G or C T) are more common than transversions (purine (adenine or guanine)) pyrimidine (cytosine or thymine, or in RNA, uracil))[1] and are less likely to alter amino acid sequences of proteins.
Mutations are stochastic and typically occur randomly across genes. Mutation rates for single nucleotide sites for most organisms are very low, roughly 109 to 108 per site per generation, though some viruses have higher mutation rates on the order of 106 per site per generation. Among these mutations, some will be neutral or beneficial and will remain in the genome unless lost via genetic drift, and others will be detrimental and will be eliminated from the genome by natural selection.
Because mutations are extremely rare, they accumulate very slowly across generations. While the number of mutations which appears in any single generation may vary, over very long time periods they will appear to accumulate at a regular pace. Using the mutation rate per generation and the number of nucleotide differences between two sequences, divergence times can be estimated effectively via the molecular clock.
Recombination is a process that results in genetic exchange between chromosomes or chromosomal regions. Recombination counteracts physical linkage between adjacent genes, thereby reducing genetic hitchhiking. The resulting independent inheritance of genes results in more efficient selection, meaning that regions with higher recombination will harbor fewer detrimental mutations, more selectively favored variants, and fewer errors in replication and repair. Recombination can also generate particular types of mutations if chromosomes are misaligned.
Gene conversion is a type of recombination that is the product of DNA repair where nucleotide damage is corrected using an homologous genomic region as a template. Damaged bases are first excised, the damaged strand is then aligned with an undamaged homolog, and DNA synthesis repairs the excised region using the undamaged strand as a guide. Gene conversion is often responsible for homogenizing sequences of duplicate genes over long time periods, reducing nucleotide divergence.
Genetic drift is the change of allele frequencies from one generation to the next due to stochastic effects of random sampling in finite populations. Some existing variants have no effect on fitness and may increase or decrease in frequency simply due to chance. "Nearly neutral" variants whose selection coefficient is close to a threshold value of 1 / the effective population size will also be affected by chance as well as by selection and mutation. Many genomic features have been ascribed to accumulation of nearly neutral detrimental mutations as a result of small effective population sizes.[2] With a smaller effective population size, a larger variety of mutations will behave as if they are neutral due to inefficiency of selection.
Selection occurs when organisms with greater fitness, i.e. greater ability to survive or reproduce, are favored in subsequent generations, thereby increasing the instance of underlying genetic variants in a population. Selection can be the product of natural selection, artificial selection, or sexual selection. Natural selection is any selective process that occurs due to the fitness of an organism to its environment. In contrast sexual selection is a product of mate choice and can favor the spread of genetic variants which act counter to natural selection but increase desirability to the opposite sex or increase mating success. Artificial selection, also known as selective breeding, is imposed by an outside entity, typically humans, in order to increase the frequency of desired traits.
The principles of population genetics apply similarly to all types of selection, though in fact each may produce distinct effects due to clustering of genes with different functions in different parts of the genome, or due to different properties of genes in particular functional classes. For instance, sexual selection could be more likely to affect molecular evolution of the sex chromosomes due to clustering of sex specific genes on the X,Y,Z or W.
Selection can operate at the gene level at the expense of organismal fitness, resulting in a selective advantage for selfish genetic elements in spite of a host cost. Examples of such selfish elements include transposable elements, meiotic drivers, killer X chromosomes, selfish mitochondria, and self-propagating introns. (See Intragenomic conflict.)
Genome size is influenced by the amount of repetitive DNA as well as number of genes in an organism. The C-value paradox refers to the lack of correlation between organism 'complexity' and genome size. Explanations for the so-called paradox are two-fold. First, repetitive genetic elements can comprise large portions of the genome for many organisms, thereby inflating DNA content of the haploid genome. Secondly, the number of genes is not necessarily indicative of the number of developmental stages or tissue types in an organism. An organism with few developmental stages or tissue types may have large numbers of genes that influence non-developmental phenotypes, inflating gene content relative to developmental gene families.
Neutral explanations for genome size suggest that when population sizes are small, many mutations become nearly neutral. Hence, in small populations repetitive content and other 'junk' DNA can accumulate without placing the organism at a competitive disadvantage. There is little evidence to suggest that genome size is under strong widespread selection in multicellular eukaryotes. Genome size, independent of gene content, correlates poorly with most physiological traits and many eukaryotes, including mammals, harbor very large amounts of repetitive DNA.
However, birds likely have experienced strong selection for reduced genome size, in response to changing energetic needs for flight. Birds, unlike humans, produce nucleated red blood cells, and larger nuclei lead to lower levels of oxygen transport. Bird metabolism is far higher than that of mammals, due largely to flight, and oxygen needs are high. Hence, most birds have small, compact genomes with few repetitive elements. Indirect evidence suggests that non-avian theropod dinosaur ancestors of modern birds [3] also had reduced genome sizes, consistent with endothermy and high energetic needs for running speed. Many bacteria have also experienced selection for small genome size, as time of replication and energy consumption are so tightly correlated with fitness.
Transposable elements are self-replicating, selfish genetic elements which are capable of proliferating within host genomes. Many transposable elements are related to viruses, and share several proteins in common.
DNA transposons are cut and paste transposable elements which excise DNA and move it to alternate sections of the genome.
non-LTR retrotransposons
LTR retrotransposons
Helitrons
Alu elements comprise over 10% of the human genome. They are short non-autonomous repeat sequences.
The number of chromosomes in an organism's genome also does not necessarily correlate with the amount of DNA in its genome. The ant Myrmecia pilosula has only a single pair of chromosomes[4] whereas the Adders-tongue fern Ophioglossum reticulatum has up to 1260 chromosomes.[5]Cilliate genomes house each gene in individual chromosomes, resulting in a genome which is not physically linked. Reduced linkage through creation of additional chromosomes should effectively increase the efficiency of selection.
Changes in chromosome number can play a key role in speciation, as differing chromosome numbers can serve as a barrier to reproduction in hybrids. Human chromosome 2 was created from a fusion of two chimpanzee chromosomes and still contains central telomeres as well as a vestigial second centromere. Polyploidy, especially allopolyploidy, which occurs often in plants, can also result in reproductive incompatibilities with parental species. Agrodiatus blue butterflies have diverse chromosome numbers ranging from n=10 to n=134 and additionally have one of the highest rates of speciation identified to date.[6]
Different organisms house different numbers of genes within their genomes as well as different patterns in the distribution of genes throughout the genome. Some organisms, such as most bacteria, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis have particularly compact genomes with little repetitive content or non-coding DNA. Other organisms, like mammals or maize, have large amounts of repetitive DNA, long introns, and substantial spacing between different genes. The content and distribution of genes within the genome can influence the rate at which certain types of mutations occur and can influence the subsequent evolution of different species. Genes with longer introns are more likely to recombine due to increased physical distance over the coding sequence. As such, long introns may facilitate ectopic recombination, and result in higher rates of new gene formation.
In addition to the nuclear genome, endosymbiont organelles contain their own genetic material typically as circular plasmids. Mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA varies across taxa, but membrane-bound proteins, especially electron transport chain constituents are most often encoded in the organelle. Chloroplasts and mitochondria are maternally inherited in most species, as the organelles must pass through the egg. In a rare departure, some species of mussels are known to inherit mitochondria from father to son.
New genes arise from several different genetic mechanisms including gene duplication, de novo origination, retrotransposition, chimeric gene formation, recruitment of non-coding sequence, and gene truncation.
Gene duplication initially leads to redundancy. However, duplicated gene sequences can mutate to develop new functions or specialize so that the new gene performs a subset of the original ancestral functions. In addition to duplicating whole genes, sometimes only a domain or part of a protein is duplicated so that the resulting gene is an elongated version of the parental gene.
Retrotransposition creates new genes by copying mRNA to DNA and inserting it into the genome. Retrogenes often insert into new genomic locations, and often develop new expression patterns and functions.
Chimeric genes form when duplication, deletion, or incomplete retrotransposition combine portions of two different coding sequences to produce a novel gene sequence. Chimeras often cause regulatory changes and can shuffle protein domains to produce novel adaptive functions.
De novo origin. Novel genes can also arise from previously non-coding DNA.[7] For instance, Levine and colleagues reported the origin of five new genes in the D. melanogaster genome from noncoding DNA.[8][9] Similar de novo origin of genes has been also shown in other organisms such as yeast,[10] rice[11] and humans.[12] De novo genes may evolve from transcripts that are already expressed at low levels.[13] Mutation of a stop codon to a regular codon or a frameshift may cause an extended protein that includes a previously non-coding sequence.
Molecular systematics is the product of the traditional fields of systematics and molecular genetics. It uses DNA, RNA, or protein sequences to resolve questions in systematics, i.e. about their correct scientific classification or taxonomy from the point of view of evolutionary biology.
Molecular systematics has been made possible by the availability of techniques for DNA sequencing, which allow the determination of the exact sequence of nucleotides or bases in either DNA or RNA. At present it is still a long and expensive process to sequence the entire genome of an organism, and this has been done for only a few species. However, it is quite feasible to determine the sequence of a defined area of a particular chromosome. Typical molecular systematic analyses require the sequencing of around 1000 base pairs.
Depending on the relative importance assigned to the various forces of evolution, three perspectives provide evolutionary explanations for molecular evolution.[14]
Selectionist hypotheses argue that selection is the driving force of molecular evolution. While acknowledging that many mutations are neutral, selectionists attribute changes in the frequencies of neutral alleles to linkage disequilibrium with other loci that are under selection, rather than to random genetic drift.[15] Biases in codon usage are usually explained with reference to the ability of even weak selection to shape molecular evolution.[16]
Neutralist hypotheses emphasize the importance of mutation, purifying selection, and random genetic drift.[17] The introduction of the neutral theory by Kimura,[18] quickly followed by King and Jukes' own findings,[19] led to a fierce debate about the relevance of neodarwinism at the molecular level. The Neutral theory of molecular evolution proposes that most mutations in DNA are at locations not important to function or fitness. These neutral changes drift towards fixation within a population. Positive changes will be very rare, and so will not greatly contribute to DNA polymorphisms.[20] Deleterious mutations will also not contribute very much to DNA diversity because they negatively affect fitness and so will not stay in the gene pool for long.[21] This theory provides a framework for the molecular clock.[20] The fate of neutral mutations are governed by genetic drift, and contribute to both nucleotide polymorphism and fixed differences between species.[22][23]
In the strictest sense, the neutral theory is not accurate.[24] Subtle changes in DNA very often have effects, but sometimes these effects are too small for natural selection to act on.[24] Even synonymous mutations are not necessarily neutral [24] because there is not a uniform amount of each codon. The nearly neutral theory expanded the neutralist perspective, suggesting that several mutations are nearly neutral, which means both random drift and natural selection is relevant to their dynamics.[24] The main difference between the neutral theory and nearly neutral theory is that the latter focuses on weak selection, not strictly neutral.[21]
Mutationists hypotheses emphasize random drift and biases in mutation patterns.[25] Sueoka was the first to propose a modern mutationist view. He proposed that the variation in GC content was not the result of positive selection, but a consequence of the GC mutational pressure.[26]
Protein evolution describes the changes over time in protein shape, function, and composition. Through quantitative analysis and experimentation, scientists have strived to understand the rate and causes of protein evolution. Using the amino acid sequences of hemoglobin and cytochrome c from multiple species, scientists were able to derive estimations of protein evolution rates. What they found was that the rates were not the same among proteins.[21] Each protein has its own rate, and that rate is constant across phylogenies (i.e., hemoglobin does not evolve at the same rate as cytochrome c, but hemoglobins from humans, mice, etc. do have comparable rates of evolution.). Not all regions within a protein mutate at the same rate; functionally important areas mutate more slowly and amino acid substitutions involving similar amino acids occurs more often than dissimilar substitutions.[21] Overall, the level of polymorphisms in proteins seems to be fairly constant. Several species (including humans, fruit flies, and mice) have similar levels of protein polymorphism.[20]
Protein evolution is inescapably tied to changes and selection of DNA polymorphisms and mutations because protein sequences change in response to alterations in the DNA sequence. Amino acid sequences and nucleic acid sequences do not mutate at the same rate. Due to the degenerate nature of DNA, bases can change without affecting the amino acid sequence. For example, there are six codons that code for leucine. Thus, despite the difference in mutation rates, it is essential to incorporate nucleic acid evolution into the discussion of protein evolution. At the end of the 1960s, two groups of scientistsKimura (1968) and King and Jukes (1969)-- independently proposed that a majority of the evolutionary changes observed in proteins were neutral.[20][21] Since then, the neutral theory has been expanded upon and debated.[21]
There are sometimes discordances between molecular and morphological evolution, which are reflected in molecular and morphological systematic studies, especially of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotic microbes. These discordances can be categorized as two types: (i) one morphology, multiple lineages (e.g. morphological convergence, cryptic species) and (ii) one lineage, multiple morphologies (e.g. phenotypic plasticity, multiple life-cycle stages). Neutral evolution possibly could explain the incongruences in some cases.[27]
The Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution publishes the journals "Molecular Biology and Evolution" and "Genome Biology and Evolution" and holds an annual international meeting. Other journals dedicated to molecular evolution include Journal of Molecular Evolution and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. Research in molecular evolution is also published in journals of genetics, molecular biology, genomics, systematics, and evolutionary biology.
Continue reading here:
Molecular evolution - Wikipedia
- 8: Techniques of Molecular Genetics - Biology LibreTexts - January 23rd, 2024
- Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports - ScienceDirect - December 18th, 2022
- Molecular Genetics and Metabolism | Journal - ScienceDirect - December 18th, 2022
- Molecular clock - Wikipedia - December 2nd, 2022
- Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose ... - December 2nd, 2022
- Molecular Genetics School of Graduate Studies - University of Toronto - October 13th, 2022
- Molecular pathways of major depressive disorder converge on the synapse | Molecular Psychiatry - Nature.com - October 13th, 2022
- Can artificial intelligence help identify best treatments for cancers? LSU researchers say yes - The Advocate - October 13th, 2022
- Results for the fiscal year on June 30, 2022 - Yahoo Finance - October 13th, 2022
- From the journals: MCP - ASBMB Today - October 13th, 2022
- From cave-dweller scientist to Nobel laureate - The Tribune India - October 13th, 2022
- Animal Genetics Market - Know the Revenue and Profit-Sources of the Industry - openPR - October 13th, 2022
- Molecular and Cell Biology and Genetics - Master of Science / PhD ... - September 25th, 2022
- What does the future hold for COVID-19? - UCLA Health Connect - September 25th, 2022
- Farooq Kperogi: Lies and truth about Obi, Atiku, and Tinubu - Peoples Gazette - September 25th, 2022
- Atavistik Bio Announces Formation of Scientific Advisory Board - Business Wire - September 25th, 2022
- Scientific Advances Point to Improved Understanding of Radiation Exposure - Livermore Independent - September 25th, 2022
- 19 million to investigate bold ideas in bioscience research - EurekAlert - September 25th, 2022
- Machel, Iwer among full list of National Awardees - Trinidad Guardian - September 25th, 2022
- Newly Discovered Protein Connected to Alzheimers Disease Risk - Neuroscience News - September 25th, 2022
- The Lab Report: Sharma Lab studies biodiversity of arachnids - The Badger Herald - September 16th, 2022
- Environmental Scientist Jesse Ausubel to Receive 2022 Nierenberg Prize for Science in the Public Interest - Scripps Institution of Oceanography - September 16th, 2022
- Malaria vax promising, to be cheap too - The Hans India - September 16th, 2022
- Dayton Therapeutics Discovers New Therapeutic Uses of Satraplatin for Treatment of Rare Lymphomas - StreetInsider.com - September 16th, 2022
- JNCASRs novel molecule prevents obesity in mice - The Hindu - September 16th, 2022
- Research Fellow in the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics job with KINGS COLLEGE LONDON | 308234 - Times Higher Education - September 8th, 2022
- Seven Queen's researchers elected to the Royal Society of Canada - Queen's University - September 8th, 2022
- Molecular Biology with an Industrial Placement Year BSc - India Education Diary - September 8th, 2022
- Whole Exome Sequencing Market Projected to Reach CAGR of 19.0% Forecast by 2029, Global Trends, Size, Share, Growth, Future Scope and Key Player... - September 8th, 2022
- Molecular prevalence and genetic diversity of Bartonella spp. in stray cats of zmir, Turkey - Parasites & Vectors - Parasites & Vectors - August 30th, 2022
- How light and temperature work together to affect plant growth - EurekAlert - August 30th, 2022
- Ancient Mummies' Lousy View of the Past - The Scientist - August 30th, 2022
- 'Gray blanket' over Australia: Genetics may have aided European rabbit invasion of continent in 1859, says study - Down To Earth Magazine - August 30th, 2022
- Meet the UNC Pembroke professor leading research on Alzheimers disease - The Robesonian - August 30th, 2022
- Massive Genome Study Informs the Biology of Reading and Language - Neuroscience News - August 30th, 2022
- People in the News at Gencove, IsoPlexis, HTG Molecular, More - GenomeWeb - August 30th, 2022
- Professor (with Head of Department potential), Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics job with KINGS COLLEGE LONDON | 304203 - Times Higher... - August 14th, 2022
- Kathy C. Cordes, a former Baltimore Sun artist who later worked at NASA's Space Telescope Institute, dies Baltimore Sun - Baltimore Sun - August 14th, 2022
- Discovery of the interactions between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi - EurekAlert - August 14th, 2022
- A new drug could repair stroke damage to memory and movement - Freethink - August 14th, 2022
- CDC Says Recent Flu Season Mild, Maybe Owing to COVID Precautions - Medscape - August 14th, 2022
- Study Using NanoStrings GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler Featured on the Cover of Nature Genetics - BioSpace - August 14th, 2022
- New virus detected in China; here's everything you need to know about it - WCCO - August 14th, 2022
- Relief Therapeutics and Acer Therapeutics Announce that the European Commission Has Granted Orphan Drug Designation for ACER-001 in Maple Syrup Urine... - August 14th, 2022
- Psychiatry, Fraud, and the Case for a Class-Action Lawsuit - Mad In America - Mad in America - August 14th, 2022
- Scientists Grow Mouse Embryos Without Sperm Or Eggs - EverythingGP - August 14th, 2022
- The Pitfalls of Evolutionary Genomics - SciTechDaily - August 14th, 2022
- How a simple home DNA test unravelled the genetic code that could help prolong my life - The National - August 14th, 2022
- Graduate Research Officer job with UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | 304277 - Times Higher Education - August 14th, 2022
- These Are the Degrees of the Future - Gizmodo - August 14th, 2022
- University of Chicago obituaries - University of Chicago - August 14th, 2022
- Letter: Abortion and social planning - Daily Herald - August 14th, 2022
- Postdoctoral Researcher, Seaweed Molecular Biology, Physiology and Genetics, Ryan Institute, School job with NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, GALWAY |... - August 5th, 2022
- Researchers crack 30-year-old mystery of odour switching in worms - University of Toronto - August 5th, 2022
- 1st synthetic mouse embryos complete with beating hearts and brains created with no sperm, eggs or womb - Livescience.com - August 5th, 2022
- Rallybio Appoints Wendy K. Chung, M.D., Ph.D., to Its Board of Directors - Business Wire - August 5th, 2022
- Luke Goldman: Using eDNA to save the Atlantic cod - UMaine News - University of Maine - University of Maine - August 5th, 2022
- Duke Announces Winners of the 2022 DST Spark Seed Grants - Duke Today - July 27th, 2022
- WVXU: UC scientists are deep-freezing molecules. Here's why they're so excited about it - University of Cincinnati - July 27th, 2022
- Better Diagnosis and Treatment: Genetic Clues to Age-Related Macular Degeneration - SciTechDaily - July 27th, 2022
- Regeneron Announces the 2022 Winners of the Regeneron Prize for Creative Innovation - PR Newswire - July 27th, 2022
- Replay Launches with $55 Million Seed to Reprogram Biology by Writing and Delivering Big DNA - GlobeNewswire - July 27th, 2022
- How is Biotechnology revolutionising food and beverage industry? - The Statesman - July 27th, 2022
- ACP offers guidance on the ethical use of genetic testing and precision medicine - EurekAlert - July 27th, 2022
- Barbour Appointed Dean of The Graduate School and Vice Provost for Graduate Education - Duke Today - July 19th, 2022
- UC scientists are deep-freezing molecules. Here's why they're so excited about it - WVXU - July 19th, 2022
- Research Fellow, Molecular Biology / Recombinant Protein Production and Purification (Biol Sci) job with NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE | 301436 -... - July 19th, 2022
- UF researchers discover new way to inhibit virus that causes COVID-19 - University of Florida - July 19th, 2022
- Streamlined Genomic Testing Platforms Are Taking on A Bigger Role in Cancer Care - OncLive - July 19th, 2022
- Bachelor of Science in Biology - National University - July 19th, 2022
- Genes may influence our successes and failures in life, according to Professor Kathryn Paige Harden - ABC News - July 19th, 2022
- Lecturer for Department of Experimental Biology job with MASARYK UNIVERSITY | 301048 - Times Higher Education - July 19th, 2022
- Lecturer in Biology (Education Focused) job with UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY | 300815 - Times Higher Education - July 19th, 2022
- People's University Is All About Dinosaurs This Summer - Wheeling Intelligencer - July 19th, 2022
- Radiologists hope to use AI to improve readings - University of Miami: News@theU - July 19th, 2022
- Rare Disease Genetic Testing Market 2022 Emerging Trends, Comprehensive Study With Top Companies and Key Players till 2030 - Taiwan News - July 11th, 2022
- Proteases implicated in ulcerative colitis - ASBMB Today - July 11th, 2022
- Cancer has been a scourge for centuries, advances in science have made the disease far less intractable - The Indian Express - July 11th, 2022
- Scientists discover key genes behind insect migrations - EurekAlert - July 11th, 2022
- Neuroimaging Techniques and What a Brain Image Can Tell Us - Technology Networks - July 11th, 2022